Skip to main content

Table 3 Estimates of validity of non-occupational continuous physical activity measurements derived from the EPIC questionnaire when compared to accelerometer measurements of total physical activity

From: Validity and repeatability of the EPIC physical activity questionnaire: a validation study using accelerometers as an objective measure

Accelerometer versus 10-month EPIC

MET-hours/week

 

Correlation (ρ)

95% CI

 

Total non-occupational activitya

   

   Overallb (n = 182)

0.21

0.07, 0.35

**

Gender

   

Males (n = 100)

0.24

0.05, 0.42

*

Females (n = 82)

0.16

-0.06, 0.36

 

Body mass index

   

< 27.2 (n = 89)

0.33

0.14, 0.51

**

≥ 27.2 (n = 92)

0.12

-0.09, 0.32

 

Age

   

< 58 years (n = 95)

0.25

0.05, 0.43

*

≥ 58 years (n = 87)

0.18

-0.03, 0.37

 

Employment status

   

Full-time work (n = 113)

0.17

-0.02, 0.34

 

Other (n = 68)

0.30

0.07, 0.50

*

Vigorous activity, self-ratedc

0.18

0.04, 0.32

*

Vigorous activity, MET-assignedc

0.23

0.09, 0.37

**

Light-moderate activityd

0.19

0.05, 0.33

**

  1. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001
  2. EPIC, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; ρ, Spearman rank correlation coefficient; CI, confidence interval
  3. a EPIC total non-occupational activity = recreational + household physical activity; compared to total accelerometer activity (sum of light, moderate and vigorous activity)
  4. b There were no statistically significant differences in correlations for non-occupational activity between subgroups (Pdiff >0.10)
  5. c Time spent in vigorous non-occupational activity was measured (1) in a separate question about time in activities causing sweating or faster heartbeat, and (2), using the sum of time spent in activities with MET values ≥ 6 (i.e. cycling, sports and stair climbing); these estimates were compared to vigorous-intensity accelerometer activity.
  6. d Time spent in light-moderate non-occupational activity was estimated using the sum of time spent in activities with MET values < 6 (i.e. housework, walking, gardening, home repair); these estimates were compared to light+moderate-intensity accelerometer activity.