Skip to main content

Table 4 Agreement between mkeasures of physical activity with comparable units in controlled laboratory settings

From: Direct and indirect measurement of physical activity in older adults: a systematic review of the literature

Author (Year)

Participants and/or conditions

Measure1

Mean (SD)

Measure 2

Mean (SD)

Difference

% Agreement a

Bergman (2009) Part 1

Total sample, men, women

Pedometer (SW3; waist) steps

444(182); 476(237); 435(170)

Observed steps

433(175); 467(237); 423(162)

−11; 9; 12

 

Total sample, men, women

Pedometer (DW; ankle) steps

225(135); 200(146) 232(136)

Observed steps

433(175); 423(162); 435(170)

−208; −223; −203

 

Cyarto (2004)

Nursing home slow, normal; fast pace

Pedometer (DW-200) waist)

 

Observed steps

  

−73.9(34.8); 55.1(37.8);-46.3(38.1)

Senior centre slow, normal fast pace

Pedometer (DW-200 waist)

 

Observed steps

  

−24.7(36.1); −13.3(23.6); −7.1(26.2)

Fehling (1999)

Total sample/treadmill test

EE from accelerometer (Caltrac)

 

EE from indirect calorimetry

  

10% to 52%

Exercise group/step test

EE from accelerometer (Caltrac)

 

EE from indirect calorimetry

  

−19% to −28%

Total sample /treadmill test

EE from accelerometer (Tritrac)

 

EE from Indirect calorimetry

  

−12% to −37%

Exercise group/step test

EE from accelerometer (Tritrac)

 

EE from Indirect calorimetry

  

−58% to −60%

Grant (2008)

Treadmill at 0.67, 0.9, 1.12, 1.34, 1.56 m/s

Pedometer (SW-200)

 

Observed steps

437(56); 490(55); 532(47); 585(47); 624(43)

184.3; 132.7; 71.8; 31.2; 4.0

42.2; 27.1; 13.5; 5.3; <1

Treadmill at 0.67, 0.9, 1.12, 1.34, 1.56 m/s

Pedometer (NL-2000)

 

Observed steps

437(56); 490(55); 532(47); 585(47); 624(43)

85.4; 4.8; 0; −0.9; −2.4

19.5; <1; 0; <1; <1

Leaf (1995)

Treadmill

EE (kcals) from Indirect Calorimetry

43.4(8.41)

EE (kcals) from acceleromtery (Caltrac)

42.6(10.4)

−0.805

−1.86

Treadmill

EE (kcals) from Indirect Caloriemtery

43.4(8.41)

EE (kcals) from ACSM equation

38.2(8.7)

−5.17

−11.92%

Marsh (2007)

131 m walk test

Pedometer (Accusplit Eagle 120) steps

196.0(62.6)

Observed steps

218.9(29)

−22.8(53.9)

−10.3(25.4)

 

Pedometer (NL-2000) steps

214.9(27.2)

Observed steps

218.9(29)

−4.0(5.8)

−1.7(2.5)

 

Accelerometry (IDEEA pattern recognition)

213.2(29.7)

Observed steps

218.9(29)

−5.6(7.8)

−2.5(3.7)

Resnick (2001)

One min walk tests

Step counter (SAM) steps

43.9(9.4)

Observed steps

43.05

0.85

1.98

Storti (2007)

Total Sample

Pedometer (DW) steps

 

Observed steps

  

−13%

Slow, middle, fast gait

Pedometer (DW) steps

 

Observed steps

  

−31.2;-12.7; −11.1

Total Sample

Accelerometer (Actigraph)

 

Observed steps

  

−7.1%

Slow, middle, fast gait

Accelerometer (Actigraph) steps

 

Observed steps

  

−19.1;-5.7; −0.7

Total sample

Step counter (SAM) steps

 

Observed steps

  

+6.9%

Slow, middle, fast gait

Step counter (SAM) steps

 

Observed steps

  

+6.5;+6.6; +2.8

  1. aAbbreviations: TEE daily total energy expenditure, DLW doubly labeled water, QAPSE Questionnaire D’Activité Physique Saint Etienne, YPAS Yale Physical Activity Survey, MLTPAQ Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire, CAQ College Alumni Questionnaire, CHAMPS Community Health Activity Model Program for Seniors Activities Questionnaire for Older Adults, PA Physical Activity, DEE daily energy expenditure, EEPA Energy expenditure from physical activity, EEMPA Energy expenditure from moderate physical activity, MPA Moderate physical activity, HRM heart rate monitoring, RMR resting metabolic rate, BMR basal metabolic rate, LAPAQ Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam Physical Activity Questionnaire, BRFSS Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System.
  2. Note: Neither Harris (2009) nor Hurtig-Wennloff reported the data necessary to be included in this table (i.e., means, standard deviations, and/or absolute difference, percent agreement, limits of agreement)
  3. Percent agreement calculated when one of direct measures was considered the reference measure.