| Probit models for participation in transportation walking in the neighborhood (n = 1681) | Linear models for weekly minutes of transportation walking in the neighborhood (walkers only n = 611) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Probit (95CI) 1 | Probit (95CI) 2 | Marginal (%) 2 | B (95CI) 1 | B (95CI) 3 | Heckman-corrected B (95CI) 3 |
Built environment | ||||||
Walkability index | 0.058 (0.020, 0.096)* | 0.061 (0.022, 0.100)* | 2.16 | 1.52 (−2.85, 5.29) | 1.35 (−2.40, 5.09) | 3.32 (−8.84, 15.49) |
Sidewalk length (per 10 km) | 0.082 (0.033, 0.131)* | 0.084 (0.034, 0.134)* | 2.97 | 2.95 (−1.34, 7.24) | 3.02 (−1.24, 7.27) | 5.38 (−0.51, 11.27)Ω |
Attitude and neighborhood preferences | ||||||
Attitude towards walking |  | 0.050 (0.032, 0.068)* | 1.78 |  | 2.83 (0.97, 4.69)* | 4.45, (−0.58, 9.47)Ω |
Access to recreation |  | 0.096 (−0.009, 0.200)Ω | 3.38 |  | 7.43 (−2.76, 17.61) | 9.55 (6.31, 12.80)* |
Access to schools |  | 0.045 (−0.025, 0.116) | 1.60 |  |  |  |
Access to services |  | −0.056 (−0.165, 0.053) | −1.97 |  | 1.76 (−8.49, 12.01) | −0.61 (−11.70, 10.47) |
Streets pedestrian/cycle friendly |  | 0.223 (0.114, 0.332)* | 7.91 |  | 5.97 (−3.29, 15.23) | 10.54 (−0.78, 21.87)Ω |
Housing affordability/variety |  | −0.232 (−0.352, -0.112)* | −8.20 |  |  |  |
Inverse Mills Ratio | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 44.90 |
Rho | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | 0.54 |