Skip to main content

Table 5 Sensitivity analyses comparing 3 groups of the Active Plus intervention at the 12-month follow-up

From: Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a Web-based or print-delivered tailored intervention to promote physical activity among adults aged over fifty: an economic evaluation of the Active Plus intervention

 

Control group

Print-delivered intervention (PB & PE)

Web-based intervention(WB & WE)

ICERb

CEAFdand probability highest NMB

 

Costsa

Effect

Costsa

Effect

Costsa

Effect

  

PA (MET hours/week)

2760 (5301)

-2.2

2384 (4483)

2.9

2789 (5992)

0.2

Print dominant

Print at any threshold

Print: 96%

QALY-EQ-5D-3Lc

2739 (5293)

0.884

2365 (4427)

0.879

2800 (6054)

0.886

79196 (Print vs. C)

< €65000 Print, > €65000 C

Print: 65%

 

Control group

Basic intervention (PB & WB)

Environmental intervention (PE & WE)

ICER b

CEAF d and probability highest NMB

 

Costs a

Effect

Costs a

Effect

Costs a

Effect

  

PA (MET hours/week)

2760 (5301)

-2.2

2771 (5375)

1.9

2400 (5203)

1.2

503 (Environment vs. Basic)

< €550 Environment, > €550 Basic

Basic: 68%

QALY-EQ-5D-3Lc

2739 (5293)

0.884

2754 (5381)

0.879

2415 (5206)

0.886

Environment dominant

Environment at any threshold

Environment: 75%

  1. PB = printed basic intervention, PE = printed environmental intervention, WB = Web-based basic intervention, WE = Web-based environmental intervention, C = control group.
  2. aIn Euros; bcalculated according to the formula ICER = (Ci-Cc)/(Ui-Uc); cBased on the Dutch algorithm for the EuroQol (EQ-5D-3L) scores; dCost-effectiveness acceptability frontiers (CEAF); eProbability of highest net monetary benefit (NMB) based on WTP = €20,000.