Skip to main content

Table 2 Mean predicted preference scores by experimental condition

From: Effects of plain packaging, warning labels, and taxes on young people’s predicted sugar-sweetened beverage preferences: an experimental study

Preference measurea

Plain packaging

Branded packaging

p-value

No warning label

Text-only warning label

Pictorial warning label

p-value

No tax

20 % tax

p-value

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Product attractiveness

2.1 (1.6)

3.9 (1.8)

<0.001

3.7 (2.0)

3.1 (2.0)

2.2 (1.9)

<0.001

3.1 (2.0)

3.0 (1.9)

0.364

Product taste

3.4 (1.8)

5.0 (1.7)

<0.001

4.5 (1.8)

4.2 (2.0)

3.8 (2.0)

<0.001

4.4 (1.9)

4.1 (1.9)

0.025

Product quality

2.6 (1.6)

4.4 (1.5)

<0.001

3.8 (1.8)

3.4 (1.8)

3.2 (1.7)

0.001

3.6 (1.9)

3.5 (1.7)

0.407

Product coolness

2.5 (1.6)

4.2 (1.6)

<0.001

4.0 (1.8)

3.3 (1.7)

2.7 (1.6)

<0.001

3.5 (1.9)

3.2 (1.8)

0.034

Product healthfulness

1.9 (1.2)

1.9 (1.2)

0.546

2.1 (1.3)

1.8 (1.1)

1.8 (1.2)

0.027

1.9 (1.3)

1.9 (1.2)

0.844

Product cost

3.8 (2.1)

3.4 (1.8)

0.042

3.6 (2.0)

3.7 (2.0)

3.5 (1.9)

0.718

4.2 (1.9)

3.0 (1.9)

<0.001

Consumer interest (boring/interesting)

3.2 (1.4)

4.3 (1.1)

<0.001

4.0 (1.3)

3.7 (1.5)

3.5 (1.7)

<0.001

3.8 (1.4)

3.7 (1.3)

0.190

Consumer popularity (unpopular/popular)

3.2 (1.5)

4.4 (1.2)

<0.001

4.0 (1.4)

3.7 (1.5)

3.6 (1.5)

0.002

3.8 (1.5)

3.8 (1.5)

0.699

Consumer fashionableness (unfashionable/fashionable)

2.9 (1.4)

4.2 (1.2)

<0.001

3.9 (1.4)

3.6 (1.5)

3.2 (1.4)

<0.001

3.5 (1.5)

3.6 (1.4)

0.910

Consumer age (old/young)

3.6 (1.8)

3.1 (1.4)

<0.001

3.4 (1.5)

3.4 (1.7)

3.2 (1.7)

0.520

3.4 (1.7)

3.3 (1.6)

0.607

  1. aAll measures assessed on a scale of 1–7 where 1 was the worst score (least preferable) and 7 was the best (most preferable)
  2. SD standard deviation