Skip to main content

Table 1 Basic characteristics of included studies

From: The effects of active workstations on reducing work-specific sedentary time in office workers: a network meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials

First author (year)

Intervention

Sample (n)

Study design

Age

Type of work

Follow-up point a

Dropouts b

Measurement tool

Alkhajah (2012) [36], Australia

Sit-Stand Workstation

18

Quasi-RCT

33.5 ± 8.7

Student, general staff and academic staff of public health research centers within academic institutions

1-week, 3-month

3.13%

ActivPAL3 activity monitor

Typical Desk

13

39.9 ± 7.2

Bergman (2018) [20], Sweden

Treadmill Workstation + Promotion

39

RCT

52.4 ± 6.8

Staff of private companies, the government, municipalities, and counties

2-month, 6-month, 10-month, 13-month

1.25%

ActivPAL3 or activPAL3 micro activity monitor

Sit-Stand Workstation

40

50.3 ± 6.7

Carr (2016) [37], USA

Seated Elliptical + Promotion

27

RCT

45.2 ± 10.9

Staff of a private company

16-week

10.00%

GENEActiv Original accelerometer

Promotion

27

45.0 ± 10.7

Chau (2014) [38], Australia

Sit-Stand Workstation

18

Crossover-RCT

38 ± 11

Staff of a non-government health agency

4-week

0.00%

ActivPAL3 activity monitor

Typical Desk

18

Chau (2016) [39], Australia

Sit-Stand Workstation + Promotion

7

Quasi-RCT

31.0 ± 10.0

Customer care (call center) staff

1-week, 4-week, 19-week

21.05%

ActivPAL inclinometer and ActiGraph accelerometer

Typical Desk

8

35.1 ± 11.5

Donath (2015) [40], Switzerland 

Sit-Stand Workstation + Promotion

15

RCT

45 ± 12

Staff of a health insurance company

12-week

18.42%

ActiGraph wGT3X-BT

Sit-Stand Workstation

16

40 ± 10

Dutta (2014) [41], USA 

Sit-Stand Workstation + Promotion

14

Crossover-RCT

40.4

Staff of a private company

4-week

0.00%

Modular Signal Recorder 145 accelerometer

Typical Desk

14

Edwardson (2018) [42], England

Multicomponent Intervention

77

Cluster RCT (37 clusters)

41.7 ± 11.0

Staff of three university hospitals

3-month, 6-month, 12-month

23.29%

ActivPAL3 micro activity monitor

Typical Desk

69

40.8 ± 11.3

Mantzari (2019) 50, England

Sit-Stand Workstation

9

RCT

43.4 ± 11.2

Staff working full-time in professional job roles or positions involving clerical and administrative support

3-month

10.00%

ActivPAL3 activity monitor

Typical Desk

9

Engelen (2019) [43], Australia

Multicomponent Intervention

30

Quasi-RCT

44.48

Staff of a public transport organization

6-week, 13-week

10.87%

ActiGraph activity monitor

Typical Desk

16

Gao (2016) [44], Finland

Sit-Stand Workstation

24

Quasi-RCT

47.8 ± 10.8

Staff of a university

6-month

0.00%

Questionnaire

Typical Desk

21

39.0 ± 8.5

Graves (2015) [57], England 

Sit-Stand Workstation

23

RCT

38.8 ± 9.8

Staff of a university

4-week, 8-week

0.00%

Ecological momentary assessment diaries

Typical Desk

21

38.4 ± 9.3

Healy (2013) [45], Australia 

Multicomponent Intervention

22

RCT

42.4 ± 10.6

Staff of a government agency

4-week

16.28%

ActivPAL3 activity monitor

Typical Desk

21

42.9 ± 10.3

Healy (2016) [46], Australia 

Multicomponent Intervention

136

Cluster RCT (24 clusters)

44.6 ± 9.1

Staff of government agencies

3-month, 12-month

21.74%

ActivPAL3 activity monitor

Typical Desk

95

47.0 ± 9.7

Johnston (2019) [47], Australia 

Sit-Stand Workstation + Exercise

13

RCT

39 ± 11

Staff of universities

2-week, 4-week

10.34%

ActivPAL3 activity monitor

Sit-Stand Workstation

13

40 ± 11

Ma (2021) [48], Japan

Sit-Stand Workstation + Promotion

37

RCT

46.22

Staff of the technical department and general affairs department in a private company

4-month

0.00%

Active Style Pro HJA-750C accelerometer

Typical Desk

38

44.6

MacEwen (2017) [49], Canada

Sit-Stand Workstation

15

RCT

43.2 ± 9.7

Not report

12-week

0.00%

ActivPAL inclinometer and ActiGraph accelerometer

Typical Desk

10

48.9 ± 11.4

Neuhaus (2014) [51, 58], Australia

Multicomponent Intervention

16

RCT

37.3 ± 10.7

Staff of a university

3-month

9.09%

ActivPAL3 activity monitor

Sit-Stand Workstation

14

43.0 ± 10.2

Typical Desk

14

48.0 ± 11.6

Parry (2013) [52], Australia

Sit-Stand Workstation + Promotion

19

RCT

43.5 ± 6.4

Staff of three government agencies

12-week

27.91%

ActiGraph activity monitor

Promotion

43

Schuna (2014) [53], USA

Treadmill Workstation + Promotion

15

RCT

40.0 ± 9.5

Staff of a private health insurance company

3-month

0.00%

ActiGraph activity monitor

Typical Desk

16

40.3 ± 10.9

Stephens (2019) [54], Australia

Multicomponent Intervention

114

Cluster RCT (14 clusters)

44.9 ± 8.9

Staff of government agencies

3-month

0.00%

ActivPAL3 activity monitor

Typical Desk

82

45.9 ± 9.8

Tobin (2016) [56], Australia

Sit-Stand Workstation

18

RCT

34.8 ± 10.5

Staff of a non-government organization and a university

5-week

0.00%

ActivPAL3 activity monitor

Typical Desk

19

34.3 ± 8.9

Weatherson (2020) [55], Canada

Sit-Stand Workstation

17

RCT

40.96 ± 10.82

Staff of a university

3-month, 6-month

0.00%

ActivPAL3 activity monitor

Typical Desk

20

37.24 ± 12.51

  1. RCT Randomized controlled trial; Table 1 provides a detailed description of the results at the primary endpoint, which were analyzed in the meta-analysis when there were multiple assessment points (a). Additionally, the dropout rate at the primary endpoint is also presented (b).; The descriptive statistics for age (in years) are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) values