Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between individual behaviour change techniques and effectiveness of habit formation interventions

From: Effects of habit formation interventions on physical activity habit strength: meta-analysis and meta-regression

BCTs

N

Associations (β, 90% CI) with effectiveness of habit formation interventions

  

Crude model

Model 1

Problem solving

4

0.36 (0.17–0.55) **

0.28 (0.04–0.52) *

Action planning

9

0.25 (-0.34–0.84)

0.42 (-0.03–0.87)

Habit formation

6

0.23 (-0.06–0.53)

0.15 (-0.23–0.51)

Feedback on behavior

2

0.22 (-0.12–0.56)

0.19 (-0.10–0.49)

Information about antecedents

2

0.19 (-0.31–0.69)

0.09 (-0.43–0.61)

Goal setting (behavior)

4

0.18 (-0.16–0.52)

0.04 (-0.46–0.53)

Goal setting (outcome)

2

0.08 (-0.52–0.37)

0.04 (-0.44–0.51)

Social support (unspecified)

3

0.07 (-0.32–0.46)

0.16 (-0.16–0.49)

Instruction on how to perform behavior

4

0.04 (-0.35–0.43)

0.04 (-0.32–0.40)

Self-reward

3

0.03 (-0.40–0.46)

-0.16 (-0.67–0.25)

Self-monitoring of behavior

6

0.02 (-0.40–0.46)

0.03 (-0.35–0.40)

Behavioral practice / Rehearsal

3

0.01 (-0.43–0.40)

0.11 (-0.33–0.55)

Prompts/cues

5

-0.05 (-0.44–0.34)

-0.16 (-0.52–0.2)

Restructuring the physical environment

2

-0.10 (-0.63–0.42)

-0.10 (-0.60–0.40)

Habit reversal

2

-0.10 (-0.63–0.42)

-0.10 (-0.60–0.40)

Information about health consequences

2

-0.14 (-0.63–0.35)

0.05 (-0.63–0.73)

Social reward

2

-0.20 (-0.66–0.26)

-0.40 (-0.74–0.06) *

Demonstration of the behavior

3

-0.25 (-0.60–0.09)

-0.17 (-0.60–0.25)

  1. Crude model: not controlling for confounder
  2. Model 1: controlling for confounder (Duration of follow-up)
  3. BCT Behavior change techniques
  4. *p ≤ 0.05
  5. **p < 0.01