Table 2 Regression analyses for calorie labelling on size choice, kcals ordered and money spent for the three food outlets
| Â | Estimate | Std. error | Sig. | Odds ratio | 95% CI Lower | 95% CI Upper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Size choice1 | ||||||
Coffee shop beverage size | ||||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.067 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Labelling condition (kcal labels) | 0.03 | 0.13 | 0.843 | 1.03 | 0.80 | 1.32 |
Sandwich size | ||||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.156 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Labelling condition (kcal labels) | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.509 | 1.09 | 0.83 | 1.43 |
Fast food meal size | ||||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.124 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Labelling condition (kcal labels) | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.376 | 1.12 | 0.87 | 1.44 |
Kcals ordered2 | ||||||
Coffee shop | ||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.097 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Labelling condition (kcal labels) | -18.95 | 7.19 | 0.009 | - | -33.07 | -4.84 |
Sandwich shop | ||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.119 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Labelling condition (kcal labels) | -0.43 | 20.37 | 0.983 | - | -40.39 | 39.53 |
Fast food outlet | ||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.178 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Labelling condition (kcal labels) | -54.19 | 16.24 | < 0.001 | - | -86.04 | -22.33 |
Money spent3 | ||||||
Coffee shop | ||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.082 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Labelling condition (kcal labels) | -0.02 | 0.04 | 0.575 | - | -0.10 | 0.06 |
Sandwich shop | ||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.112 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Labelling condition (kcal labels) | -0.02 | 0.19 | 0.924 | - | -0.39 | 0.36 |
Fast food outlet | ||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.138 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Labelling condition (kcal labels) | -0.17 | 0.07 | 0.016 | - | -0.30 | -0.03 |