Table 4 Regression analyses for interactions between calorie labelling and proportional pricing on size choice, kcals ordered, and money spent for the three food outlets
| Â | Estimate | Std. error | Sig. | Odds ratio | 95% CI Lower | 95% CI Upper |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Size choice1 | ||||||
Coffee shop beverage size | ||||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.067 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Kcal labels*proportional pricing | -0.14 | 0.25 | 0.588 | 0.87 | 0.52 | 1.44 |
Sandwich size | ||||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.156 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Kcal labels*proportional pricing | 0.15 | 0.28 | 0.590 | 1.16 | 0.68 | 1.99 |
Fast food meal size | ||||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.124 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Kcal labels*proportional pricing | 0.08 | 0.26 | 0.296 | 1.08 | 0.65 | 1.79 |
Kcals ordered2 | ||||||
Coffee shop | ||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.097 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Kcal labels*proportional pricing | -19.75 | 14.46 | 0.172 | - | -48.12 | 8.61 |
Sandwich shop | ||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.120 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Kcal labels*proportional pricing | 48.67 | 41.51 | 0.241 | - | -32.77 | 130.11 |
Fast food outlet | ||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.179 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Kcal labels*proportional pricing | -42.91 | 32.17 | 0.183 | - | -106.04 | 20.21 |
Money spent3 | ||||||
Coffee shop | ||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.083 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Kcal labels*proportional pricing | -0.11 | 0.08 | 0.175 | - | -0.27 | 0.05 |
Sandwich shop | ||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.114 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Kcal labels*proportional pricing | 0.62 | 0.38 | 0.104 | - | -0.13 | 1.38 |
Fast food outlet | ||||||
Adjusted R2 | 0.138 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Kcal labels*proportional pricing | -0.11 | 0.14 | 0.417 | - | -0.38 | 0.16 |