Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Fig. 2

From: Criterion validity of wrist accelerometry for assessing energy intake via the intake-balance technique

Fig. 2

Bland–Altman plots comparing criterion values from doubly labeled water (DLW) against: A the Hildebrand linear model (HLM); B the Hildebrand non-linear model (HNLM); C the Hibbing left wrist (LW) two-regression model; D the Hibbing right wrist (RW) two-regression model; E the Montoye LW neural network; F the Montoye RW neural network; G the Staudenmayer linear model (LM); H the Staudenmayer random forest (RF); I the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) body weight planner for weight loss (WL); J the NIDDK body weight planner for weight maintenance (WM); K self-reported values from dietician-administered recall surveys. Note: The N for self-report was 19 rather than 24, due to exclusion of 5 participants who did not complete surveys at both timepoints

Back to article page