Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of characteristics of included studies

From: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of physical activity referral schemes’ components

Characteristic

N (%)

Location

 UK

20 (35.0)

 Sweden

12 (21.0)

 New Zealand

6 (11.0)

 Spain

3 (5.0)

 Denmark

3 (5.0)

 Canada

3 (5.0)

 Australia

3 (5.0)

 USA

2 (4.0)

 Norway

1 (2.0)

 The Netherlands

2 (4.0)

 Mexico

1 (2.0)

 Finland

1 (2.0)

Year of publication

 1990 to 2000

4 (7.0)

 2001 to 2010

20 (35.0)

 2011 to 2022

33 (58.0)

Study design

 Experimental design

28 (49.0)

 Quasi-experimental design

12 (21.0)

 Observational

17 (30.0)

Comparison group1

 Usual care

14 (25.0)

 Advice only

5 (9.0)

 Standard/low-intensive PARS

11 (19.0)

 Prescription/referral only

3 (5.0)

 Other comparison

4 (7.0)

 No comparison

21 (37.0)

Sample size

 Total

44,690

 Median, Range

316 (14 to 6610)

14 to 250

27 (47.0)

251 to 1000

21 (37.0)

  > 1000

9 (16.0)

Outcomes1

 Physical activity

45 (79.0)

Subjective measure (e.g. questionnaires)

34 (75.6)

Objective measure (e.g. accelerometers)

4 (8.9)

Both

7 (15.6)

 Uptake

28 (49.0)

 Adherence

34 (60.0)

Follow-up

 No follow-up (mid-, post-scheme)

23 (40.0)

 1 to 6 months

20 (35.0)

 7 to 12 months

13 (23.0)

 24 months

1 (2.0)

  1. 1may be multiple per study, PARS physical activity referral scheme(s)