Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of findings

From: How the COVID-19 pandemic and related school closures reduce physical activity among children and adolescents in the WHO European Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Outcome

Number of studies

Standardized mean difference, 95% CI

Summary of findings

Certainty of evidence (GRADE)

Total physical activity

14 studies [24, 25, 29, 30, 34, 35, 40, 41, 43, 45, 48, 49, 55, 71]

All studies: -0.57, -0.95 to -0.20

‘Some concerns RoB’ studies: -0.47, -0.95 to -0.20

Total physical activity among children and adolescents in Europe decreased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis revealed indications that stringent school closures (partially or fully closed schools) were associated with a higher decline in TPA compared with schools where there were either no restrictions or only a small number of restrictions.

Since 47% of the studies had a high or very high RoB, a high degree of heterogeneity was present and a publication bias can be assumed, we downgraded the results to ‘low certainty of evidence’.

Lowa,b,c

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

12 publications [31,32,33, 35, 37, 39, 42, 43, 45, 50, 54, 55] (data from two publications [31, 32] of the same study population with different measuring time points were aggregated)

All studies: -0.43, -0.75 to -0.10

‘Some concerns RoB’ studies: -0.43, -0.84 to -0.02

Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among children and adolescents in Europe decreased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis revealed indications that stringent school closures (partially or fully closed schools) were associated with a higher decline in MVPA compared with schools where there were either no restrictions or only a small number of restrictions.

Due to the high degree of heterogeneity and an indicated publication bias, we downgraded the results to ‘low certainty of evidence’.

Lowb,d

Sporting activity

3 publications [31, 32, 51]

No pooling occurred

Sporting activity decreased significantly in each of the three publications.

As one of the three studies had a high RoB and inconsistency of the data can be suspected, we downgraded the results to ‘low certainty of evidence’.

Lowe,f

  1. aDowngraded by -0.5 points due to 47% studies having a high or very high risk of bias
  2. bDowngraded by -1 point due to considerable heterogeneity (total physical activity: 96%, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity: 92%; wide 95% prediction intervals)
  3. cDowngraded by -0.5 points due to visual inspection of the funnel plot suggesting asymmetry and being supported by an almost statistically significant test (p = 0.052)
  4. dDowngraded by -1 point due to visual inspection of the funnel plot suggesting asymmetry and being supported by a statistically significant test (p = 0.02)
  5. eDowngraded by -1 due to one of the three studies having a high risk of bias and two studies being from the same population
  6. fDowngraded by -1 due to differences in point estimate and no overlap of 95% CI