Table 6 Level of implementation and engagement determined by number of intervention components (as outlined in Table 2)

Clusters

Participants

8 (29.6%)

80 (32.1%)

5 (20%)

41 (17.1%)

17 (63%)

163 (65.5%)

11 (44%)

111 (46.3%)

17 (63%)

163 (65.5%)

13 (52%)

142 (59.2%)

10 (37%)

86 (34.5%)

12 (48%)

98 (40.8%)

No. of clusters who had a workplace champion trained and stayed in the role past the first 3 months

8 (100%)

5 (100%)

17 (100%)

11 (100%)

17 (100%)

13 (100%)

6 (60%)

11 (91.67%)

Average percentage of participants within the clusters who completed the online education

91.81% (range 77.78–100%)

94.44 (range 83.33–100%)

92.65% (range 77.78–100%

92.88% (range 80.0-100%

92.65% (range 77.78–100%

90.34% (range 75.0-100%)

50.08% (range 0-71.43%)

68.18% (range 0-100%)

Average percentage of the monthly emails sent by workplace champions

81.0% (range 30.0-100%

88.4% (range 60.0-100%)

86.5% (range 30.0-100%)

88.8% (range 44.4–100%)

86.5% (range 30.0-100%)

80.6% (range 30.0-100%)

52.3% (range 0-100%)

71.1% (range 0-100%)

No. of clusters who delivered 1 out of 2 group catch ups

8 (100%)

5 (100%)

16 (94.12%)

11 (100%)

16 (94.12%)

11 (84.6%)

6 (60%)

10 (83.3%)

No. of clusters who delivered 2 out of 3 sitting less challenges

7 (87.5%)

5 (100%)

16 (94.12%)

10 (90.91%)

16 (94.12%)

10 (76.92)

5 (50%)

8 (66.67%)

Average percentage of the cluster who used any self-monitoring tool

86.7% (range 75.5–100%)

85.1% (range 75.0-100%)

68.7% (range 0-100%)

66.1% (range 16.7–100%)

68.7% (range 0-100%)

69.1% (16.7–100%)

44.2% (range 0-100%)

46.0% (range 16.7–100%)

Average percentage of participants within a cluster who reported using the height-adjustable workstation > few times a week

N/A

95.28% (87.5–100%

N/A

95.12% (range 84.21–100%)

N/A

92.24% (range 75.0-100%)

N/A

68.98% (range 33.33–100%)