Table 7 Level of implementation and engagement determined by percentage of implementation and engagement (as outlined in Table 3)

Clusters

Participants

8 (29.6%)

80 (32.1%)

5 (20%)

41 (17.1%)

19 (70.4%

196 (78.7%)

12 (48%)

113 (47.1%)

21 (77.8%)

213 (85.5%)

22 (88%)

221 (92.1%)

6 (22.2%)

36 (14.5%)

3 (12%)

19 (7.9%)

No. of clusters who had a workplace champion trained and stayed in the role past the first 3 months

8 (100%)

5 (100%)

19 (100%)

12 (100%)

21 (100%)

22 (100%)

2 (33.3%)

2 (66.7%)

Average percentage of participants within the clusters who completed the online education

91.81% (range 77.78–100%)

94.44 (range 83.33–100%)

87.98% (range 66.67–100%)

88.94% (range 66.67–100%)

86.35% (60.00-100%)

80.88% (range 33.33–100%)

43.75% (range 0-100%)

71.1% (33.3–100%)

Average percentage of the monthly emails sent by workplace champions

81.0% (range 30.0-100%

88.4% (range 60.0-100%)

87.0% (range 30.0-100%)

83.3% (range 22.2–100%)

85.4% (range 30.0-100%)

76.4% (range 0-100%)

33.3% (range 0-100%)

73.3% (range 20.0-100%)

No. of clusters who delivered 1 out of 2 group catch ups

8 (100%)

5 (100%)

18 (94.7%)

11 (91.7%)

20 (95.2%)

19 (86.4%)

2 (33.3%)

2 (66.7%)

No. of clusters who delivered 2 out of 3 sitting less challenges

7 (87.5%)

5 (100%)

18 (94.7%)

10 (83.3%)

19 (90.5%)

17 (77.3%)

2 (33.3%)

1 (33.3%)

Average percentage of the cluster who used any self-monitoring tool

86.7% (range 75.5–100%)

85.1% (range 75.0-100%)

76.1% (range 50.0-100%

69.8% (range 50.0-100%)

73.0% (range 40.0-100%)

62.6% (range 25.0-100%)

12.9% (0-100%)

24.4% (16.7–40.0%)

Average percentage of participants within a cluster who reported using the height-adjustable workstation > few times a week

N/A

95.28% (87.5–100%

N/A

90.26% (62.5–100%)

N/A

81.22 (range 33.3–100%)

N/A

80.0% (range 60–100%)