The role of psychosocial well-being and emotion-driven impulsiveness in food choices of European adolescents

Table 2 Estimated effects of psychosocial well-being and emotion-driven impulsiveness on average fat and sweet propensity scores (N = 2,065 at W3; mean age = 13.4)

		Outcome [MD (95%-CI)]
Exposure	Category levels	Emotion-driven impulsiveness	Sweet propensity	Fat propensity
Psychosocial well-being	Ref. level: low
	moderate	-2.53 (-3.36, -1.71)	-0.30 (-1.44, 0.84)	-0.58 (-1.60, 0.45)
	high	-4.95 (-5.79, -4.12)	-1.43 (-2.61, -0.25)	-0.73 (-1.76, 0.30)
Emotion-driven impulsiveness	Ref. level: high
	moderate	/	-1.01 (-2.16, 0.15)	-0.34 (-1.33, 0.66)
	low	/	-2.07 (-3.26, -0.87)	-1.85 (-2.88, -2.81)

W2: Variables measured in 2009–2010; W3: Variables measured in 2013–2014
Ref. level: Reference level; MD: Mean Difference; 95%-CI: 95% confidence interval
Exposure psychosocial well-being: adjusted for sweet or fat propensity (depending on outcome), psychosocial well-being, age, highest educational level of parents, physical activity, sleep quality, and media use at W2; sex, country, and BMI at W3
Exposure emotion-driven impulsiveness: adjusted for sweet or fat propensity (depending on outcome), psychosocial well-being, age, sex, highest educational level of parents, physical activity, sleep quality, and media use at W2; psychosocial well-being, sex, country, and BMI at W3

ISSN: 1479-5868