Effects of remote coaching following supervised exercise oncology rehabilitation on physical activity levels, physical fitness, and patient-reported outcomes: a randomised controlled trial

Table 4 Between group differences at T1 using linear regression^A

	Mean difference ^B (95% CI)	P-value	Cohen’s d effect size^d
Weekly accelerometer-derived total PA (min)	45 (-50;140)	0.35	0.17
Weekly accelerometer-derived sedentary wake time (min) ^C	-36 (-389;318)	0.84	-0.05
Weekly self-reported weekly MVPA (min)	-16 (-190;158)	0.86	-0.04
Peak oxygen uptake, VO₂ peak (mL/kg/min)	-0.7 (-2.9;1.4)	0.50	-0.11
1-RM leg press (kg)	2(-12;17)	0.77	0.06
1-RM chest press (kg)	0 (-4;5)	0.94	0.00
Quality of Life, EORTC-QLQ- C30 Sum score	4.0 (-2.9;10.0)	0.28	0.26
Fatigue, MFI Sum score	-2 (-10;6)	0.52	-0.11
Anxiety and depression, HADS Sum score	-1 (-4;2)	0.42	-0.14
Return to work, percentage hours returned (%)	-7 (-29;16)	0.55	-0.15

^A Corrected for gender, age and baseline values of weekly physical activity
^B Mean difference is = unstandardised B; COACH group minus CONTROL group
^C Weekly time that participants were sedentary during waking hours
^d Calculated as the corrected mean difference divided by the pooled standard deviation for both groups at T1
T1 = follow-up; PA = physical activity, MVPA = moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, VO2peak = peak oxygen uptake 1-RM = one-repetition maximum EORTC-QLQ-C30 = European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30, MFI-20= Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20, HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

ISSN: 1479-5868