Step one: Site and the PWES as predictors | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Self-efficacy n = 836 | R2adj | R2 change | F change | Beta 1 | Beta 2 |
Block 1 | .00 | .01 | 2.62 | Â | Â |
   Site one |  |  |  | .06 |  |
   Site two |  |  |  | .08 |  |
Block 2 | .04 | .04 | 30.81* | Â | Â |
   PWES |  |  |  |  | .20* |
Outcome Exp. Pros n = 844 | R2adj | R2 change | F change | Beta 1 | Beta 2 |
Block 1 | .00 | .00 | 1.00 | Â | Â |
   Site one |  |  |  | -.05 |  |
   Site two |  |  |  | -.01 |  |
Block 2 | .01 | .01 | 8.04* | Â | Â |
   PWES |  |  |  |  | .10* |
Outcome Exp. Cons n = 840 | R2adj | R2 change | F change | Beta 1 | Beta 2 |
Block 1 | .02 | .02 | 7.59* | Â | Â |
   Site one |  |  |  | -.05 |  |
   Site two |  |  |  | -.14* |  |
Block 2 | .03 | .01 | 12.22* | Â | Â |
   PWES |  |  |  |  | -.12* |