Skip to main content

Table 1 Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Components and Ratings

From: A review of the nature and effectiveness of nutrition interventions in adult males – a guide for intervention strategies

Components

Strong

Moderate

Weak

Selection Bias

Very Likely to be representative of the target population and greater than 80% participation rate

Somewhat likely to pre representative of the target population and 60–79% participation rate

All other responses or not stated

Design

RCT or CCT

Cohort analytic, case control, cohort or an interrupted time series

All other designs of design not stated

Confounders

Controlled for at least 80% of confounders

Controlled for at least 60–79% of confounders

Confounders not controlled for or not stated

Blinding `

Blinding on outcome assessor and study participants to intervention status and/or research question

Blinding of either outcome assessor or study participants

Outcome assessor and study participants are aware of intervention status and/or research question

Data collection methods

Tools are valid and reliable

Tools are valid but reliability not described

No evidenced of validity or reliability

Withdrawals and dropouts

Follow-up rate of >80% of participants

Follow-up rate of 60–79% of participants

Follow-up rate of <60% of participants or withdrawals and dropouts not described