Skip to main content

Table 4 Mediating role of socio-ecological factors on association between education and TV viewing a

From: Educational inequalities in TV viewing among older adults: a mediation analysis of ecological factors

Mediators

αβ (SE)

95% CI

t (p)

% mediation

Single mediation models

Personal factors

    

BMI

-0.002 (0.001)

-0.004, -0.001

-3.6***

5.7

Quality of life

-0.002 (0.001)

-0.004, 0.000

-1.9

5.1

Social environmental factors

    

Social participation

-0.001 (0.001)

-0.002, 0.001

-0.9

1.5

Interpersonal trust

-0.000 (0.001)

-0.002, 0.001

-0.4

0.6

Social cohesion

-0.000 (0.001)

-0.001, 0.000

-1.0

0.5

Personal safety

-0.002 (0.001)

-0.003, -0.001

-6.6***

5.0

Physical environmental factors

    

Aesthetics

-0.002 (0.001)

-0.002, -0.001

-7.4***

3.7

Physical activity environment

-0.001 (0.001)

-0.002, -0.001

-2.7**

3.3

Number of televisions in house

-0.001 (0.000)

-0.002, -0.001

-3.1**

3.2

Multiple mediation model

Total mediation role

    

  All significant single mediators together

-0.006 (0.002)

-0.009, -0.002

-3.2**

13.4

Independent mediating role of the mediators in the multiple mediation model

BMI

-0.002 (0.001)

-0.003, -0.001

-3.2**

4.5

Personal safety

-0.001 (0.000)

-0.002, -0.001

-4.3***

3.1

Neighbourhood aesthetics

-0.001 (0.000)

-0.001, -0.001

-3.2**

1.5

Physical activity environment

-0.001 (0.001)

-0.002, 0.001

-1.0

1.2

Number of televisions in house

-0.001 (0.000)

-0.002, -0.001

-3.2**

3.0

  1. aAdjusted for age and retirement status and clustering by neighbourhood area.
  2. CI confidence interval.
  3. **p < 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.