Table 2 Results of the stepwise linear regression analyses with backward elimination concerning active transport to and from school
Active transport to and from school | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MODEL 1 | MODEL 2 | MODEL 3 | |||||||
Demographic characteristics | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p |
Age (yrs) | 0.032(0.030) | −0.027-0.091 | 0.277 | 0.062(0.031) | 0.001-0.123 | 0.045 | 0.061(0.031) | 0.000-0.122 | 0.050 |
Gender (ref: male) | 0.104(0.053) | 0.000-0.208 | 0.049 | 0.068(0.054) | −0.038-0.174 | 0.206 | 0.067(0.056) | −0.043-0.177 | 0.228 |
Parental employment | |||||||||
Both unemployed (ref) | |||||||||
One parent unemployed | 0.263(0.145) | −0.021-0.547 | 0.070 | 0.321(0.155) | 0.017-0.625 | 0.039 | 0.283(0.155) | −0.021-0.587 | 0.067 |
Both employed | 0.403(0.143) | 0.123-0.683 | 0.005 | 0.392(0.152) | 0.094-0.690 | 0.010 | 0.377(0.150) | 0.083-0.671 | 0.012 |
Educational attainment mother | |||||||||
Less than high school (ref) | |||||||||
Completed high school | −0.128(0.106) | −0.336-0.080 | 0.229 | −0.147(0.110) | −0.363-0.069 | 0.182 | −0.119(0.111) | −0.337-0.099 | 0.284 |
Completed college | 0.001(0.105) | −0.205-0.207 | 0.999 | −0.011(0.109) | −0.225-0.203 | 0.916 | 0.059(0.109) | −0.155-0.273 | 0.590 |
Completed University | 0.004(0.111) | −0.214-0.222 | 0.975 | −0.057(0.115) | −0.282-0.168 | 0.619 | −0.059(0.117) | −0.288-0.170 | 0.616 |
Educational attainment father | |||||||||
Less than high school (ref) | |||||||||
Completed high school | |||||||||
Completed college | |||||||||
Completed University | |||||||||
Psychosocial factors | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p |
Modeling | 0.046(0.038) | −0.028-0.120 | 0.226 | ||||||
Social norm | −0.026(0.028) | −0.081-0.029 | 0.350 | ||||||
Social support from family | 0.058(0.035) | −0.011-0.127 | 0.099 | ||||||
Social support from friends | 0.026(0.033) | −0.039-0.091 | 0.428 | ||||||
Self-efficacy internal | 0.084(0.045) | −0.004-0.172 | 0.059 | ||||||
Self-efficacy external | |||||||||
Perceived benefits | −0.112(0.052) | −0.224-(−0.020) | 0.030 | ||||||
Perceived barriers | 0.035(0.058) | −0.079-0.149 | 0.550 | ||||||
Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p |
Residential density | 0.001(0.001) | −0.001-0.003 | 0.065 | 0.001(0.001) | −0.001-0.003 | 0.089 | |||
Land use mix diversity | −0.099(0.048) | −0.193-(−0.005) | 0.042 | −0.112(0.049) | −0.208-(−0.016) | 0.021 | |||
Land use mix access | |||||||||
Distance to school | 0.165(0.024) | 0.118-0.212 | <0.001 | 0.164(0.024) | 0.117-0.211 | <0.001 | |||
Connectivity | 0.142(0.056) | 0.032-0.252 | 0.011 | 0.116(0.057) | 0.004-0.228 | 0.043 | |||
Walking infrastructure | −0.096(0.044) | −0.182-(−0.010) | 0.032 | −0.091(0.045) | −0.179-(−0.003) | 0.042 | |||
Cycling infrastructure | |||||||||
Safety for cycling | |||||||||
Aesthetics | |||||||||
Safety for traffic | |||||||||
Safety for crime | 0.092(0.051) | −0.008-0.192 | 0.070 | 0.097(0.052) | −0.005-0.199 | 0.062 | |||