Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the environment along the actual and shortest possible routes (n = 113)

From: Route choices of transport bicyclists: a comparison of actually used and shortest routes

Variable

Mean actual route (SD)

Mean shortest route (SD)

Difference (actual − shortest)

Significance

Traffic

    

Bicycle pathwaysa

30.0 (±28,3)

19.3 (±20,8)

10.7

<0.001

Bicycle lanesa

31.3 (±26.7)

30.6 (±22.7)

0.5

0.723

Side roads without bicycle lanesa

21.6 (±14,5)

24.6 (±14,6)

−3.0

0.001

Main roads without bicycle lanesa

9.8 (±17.7)

21.2 (±28.1)

−10.4

<0.001

Traffic lightsb

1.5 (±1,1)

1.7 (±1,0)

−0.2

0.001

Crossingsb

1.3 (±0.9)

1.6 (±1.0)

−0.3

<0.001

Greenery/aesthetics

    

Green and aquatic areasc

19.2 (±10.9)

14.5 (±7.7)

4.7

<0.001

-Urban treesb

44.9 (±30.7)

42.2 (±27.3)

2.7

0.089

-Sports and recreation areasc

7.7 (±8.7)

4.3 (±5.2)

3.4

<0.001

-Playing fieldsc

0.9 (±1.2)

0.8 (±1.5)

0.1

0.042

-Forestsc

0.6 (±1.8)

0.5 (±1.5)

0.1

0.341

-Aquatic areasc

2.9 (±4.6)

1.3 (±2.1)

1.6

<0.001

Topography

    

Steepnessd

0.2 (±0.6)

0.4 (±0.9)

0.2

0.031

Other land use

    

Residential areasc

28.6 (±20.1)

28.1 (±19.4)

0.5

0.778

Industrial and commercial areasc

3.2 (±4.7)

3.2 (±4.7)

0.0

0.870

Residential densitye

64.2 (±30.2)

67.6 (±29.2)

−3.4

0.034

Land-use mixf

0.82 (±0.1)

0.79 (±0.1)

0.02

<0.001

Shops and servicesb

4.4 (±4.5)

5.4 (±5.0)

−1.0

<0.001

  1. a = % of the trip length, b = points per 1 km trip length, c = % of the environment along the trip (15 m buffer), d = sum of the gradient values per 1 km trip (0: flat – 8: very steep), e = residences per ha in the route neighbourhood, f = value from the LUM formula (Frank et al., [18]), SD = standard deviation.
  2. * = paired t-tests for normally distributed data and Wilcoxon tests for data with a skewed distribution.