Skip to main content

Table 2 Trends in leisure-time physical activity in deprived target districts versus the rest of the Netherlands

From: The impact of area-based initiatives on physical activity trends in deprived areas; a quasi-experimental evaluation of the Dutch District Approach

 

Trend in walking/cycling/sportsa(regression coefficient β (95% confidence interval))

Modelb

Period

Pre intervention

Intervention

Intervention versus pre intervention

 

District type

   

Leisure-time walking

   

M0

Deprived target districts

−0.04 (−0.08 – 0.00)

0.11 (0.04 – 0.18)*

0.15 (0.04 – 0.25)*

 

Rest of the Netherlands

−0.00 (−0.01 – 0.00)

0.02 (0.01 – 0.04)*

0.03 (0.01 – 0.04)*

 

Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands

0.12 (0.02 – 0.22)*

M1

Deprived target districts

−0.04 (−0.08 – 0.01)

0.11 (0.04 – 0.19)*

0.15 (0.04 – 0.30)*

 

Rest of the Netherlands

−0.00 (−0.01 – 0.00)

0.02 (0.01 – 0.03)*

0.03 (0.01 – 0.04)*

 

Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands

0.12 (0.02 – 0.23)*

M2

Deprived target districts

−0.04 (−0.08 – 0.00)

0.11 (0.03 – 0.18)*

0.14 (0.04 – 0.25)*

Rest of the Netherlands

−0.00 (−0.01 – 0.00)

0.02 (0.01 – 0.03)*

0.02 (0.00 – 0.04)*

Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands

0.12 (0.02 – 0.23)*

Leisure-time cycling

   

M0

Deprived target districts

0.04 (0.00 – 0.08)*

0.00 (−0.07 – 0.07)

−0.04 (−0.14 – 0.06)

 

Rest of the Netherlands

0.00 (−0.00 – 0.01)

0.03 (0.02 – 0.04)*

0.02 (0.01 – 0.04)*

 

Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands

−0.06 (−0.16 – 0.04)

M1

Deprived target districts

0.05 (0.00 – 0.09)*

0.00 (−0.07 – 0.07)

−0.04 (−0.14 – 0.06)

 

Rest of the Netherlands

0.01 (−0.00 – 0.01)

0.03 (0.02 – 0.04)*

0.03 (0.01 – 0.04)*

 

Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands

−0.07 (−0.17 – 0.03)

M2

Deprived target districts

0.05 (0.01 – 0.09)*

−0.00 (−0.07 – 0.07)

−0.05 (−0.15 – 0.05)

Rest of the Netherlands

0.01 (−0.00 – 0.01)

0.03 (0.01 – 0.04)*

0.02 (0.00 – 0.04)*

Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands

−0.07 (−0.17 – 0.03)

Sports

   

M0

Deprived target districts

0.02 (−0.02 – 0.06)

−0.01 (−0.08 – 0.06)

−0.03 (−0.13 – 0.07)

 

Rest of the Netherlands

0.00 (−0.00 – 0.01)

0.00 (−0.01 – 0.02)

0.00 (−0.02 – 0.02)

 

Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands

−0.03 (−0.13 – 0.07)

M1

Deprived target districts

0.02 (−0.02 – 0.06)

−0.02 (−0.09 – 0.05)

−0.04 (−0.14 – 0.07)

 

Rest of the Netherlands

0.01 (0.00 – 0.02)*

0.01 (0.00 – 0.02)*

0.00 (−0.02 – 0.02)

 

Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands

−0.04 (−0.14 – 0.07)

M2

Deprived target districts

0.02 (−0.02 – 0.06)

−0.04 (−0.12 – 0.03)

−0.06 (−0.17 – 0.04)

Rest of the Netherlands

0.00 (−0.00 – 0.01)

−0.01 (−0.02 – 0.00)

−0.01 (−0.03 – 0.01)

Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands

−0.05 (−0.16 – 0.06)

  1. *P ≤ 0.05.
  2. aTrend represents the half yearly change in ln (odds).
  3. bM0: unadjusted. M1: adjusted for age, gender, household composition, ethnicity. M2: additional adjustment for education, income.
Back to article page

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

ISSN: 1479-5868

Contact us