Skip to main content

Table 3 Change in mean Prudence Score at 12 months

From: Randomized controlled trial of a computer-tailored multiple health behaviour intervention in general practice: 12-month follow-up results

 

Dual contact group

 

Single contact group

 

Coefficient^ and p-value

 

Baseline

12 months

Net change

Baseline

12 months

Net change

 

All (n = 2872)

       

Intervention

5.78 (5.69-5.88)

6.27 (6.15-6.39)

+0.49

5.82 (5.72-5.91)

6.13 (6.03-6.24)

+0.31

0.02 (-0.07-0.11) p = 0.70

Control

5.87 (5.77-5.97)

5.89 (5.77-6.01)

+0.02

5.77 (5.67-5.87)

5.93 (5.82-6.04)

+0.16

Coefficient^

0.17 (0.10-0.24) , p < 0.01

 

0.16 (0.09-0.23), p < 0.01

  

Men (n = 884)

     

Intervention

5.62 (5.46-5.78)

6.00 (5.77-6.22)

+0.38

5.72 (5.57-5.88)

6.04 (5.86-6.22)

+0.32

0.04 (-0.21-0.13) p = 0.64

Control

5.70 (5.52-5.87)

5.66 (5.47-5.87)

-0.04

5.54 (5.36-5.71)

5.57 (5.38-5.77)

+0.03

Coefficient^

0.25 (0.8-0.42), p < 0.01

 

0.16 (0.5-0.18), p < 0.01

  

Women (n = 1988)

     

Intervention

5.87 (5.75-5.98)

6.39 (6.25-6.53)

+0.52

5.86 (5.74-5.97)

6.18 (6.05-6.37)

+0.32

0.06 (-0.06-0.18) p = 0.33

Control

5.94 (5.83-6.06)

5.98 (5.84-6.13)

+0.04

5.87 (5.75-5.98)

6.08 (5.95-6.21)

+0.21

Coefficient^

0.22 (0.13-0.31), p < 0.01

 

0.15 (0.07-0.24), p < 0.01

  
  1. ^Generalised estimating equations used to calculate coefficient and p-value.
  2. Analysis adjusted for age and education status.