Skip to main content

Table 3 Descriptive statistics, measures of internal consistency and goodness-of-fit indices for the 9 newly formed feeding practices scales – n = 462 Australian first-time mothers of 24-month-olds

From: The feeding practices and structure questionnaire: construction and initial validation in a sample of Australian first-time mothers and their 2-year olds

Factor

No. of items

Unweighted composite scores

Weighted composite scores

Reliability

Goodness-of-fit indices

Observed range

Mean (SD)

Observed range

Mean (SD)

Coefficient H

Cronbach’s α

χ2/df

RMSEA

CFI

TLI

Distrust in appetite

4

1.00-4.25

2.33 (0.73)

1.00-4.44

2.42 (0.75)

0.72

0.63

4.26

.08

.98

.93

Reward for behaviour

6

1.00-4.33

1.70 (0.69)

1.00-4.43

1.66 (0.68)

0.89

0.86

3.26

.07

.99

.97

Reward for eating

6

1.00-4.83

1.67 (0.70)

1.01-4.85

1.70 (0.74)

0.91

0.89

3.29*

.07

.99

.98

Persuasive feeding

6

1.00-4.50

2.52 (0.67)

1.00-4.29

2.38 (0.68)

0.76

0.73

2.02*

.05

.98

.97

Covert restriction

4

1.00-5.00

3.19 (0.86)

1.00-5.00

3.26 (0.91)

0.84

0.80

2.79*

.06

.99

.98

Overt restriction

4

1.00-5.00

3.38 (0.90)

1.00-5.00

3.43 (0.90)

0.62

0.61

1.57*

.04

.99

.98

Structured meal setting

4

1.75-5.00

4.08 (0.67)

1.63-5.00

4.05 (0.68)

0.80

0.79

2.48

.06

.97

.96

Structured meal timing

3

2.00-5.00

3.86 (0.60)

1.94-5.00

3.90 (0.60)

0.70

0.68

Family meal setting

3

1.00-5.00

3.93 (1.09)

1.00-4.95

3.88 (1.17)

0.96

0.87

  1. Note: The possible range is 1 to 5 for each factor.
  2. Goodness-of-fit for the ‘Structured Meal Setting’, ‘Structured Meal Timing’ and ‘Family Meal Setting’ factors was assessed simultaneously because of the low number of items for 2/3 of these congeneric models.
  3. *The congeneric model was non-significant (i.e., p > 0.05), based on the Bollen-Stine bootstrapped chi-square.