Table 3 Proportion of physical activity interventions reporting on RE-AIM indicators
RE-AIM indicators | Proportion of indicators reported | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|  | English (n = 34) | Spanish (n = 12) | All (n = 46) |
Reach | Â | Â | Â |
Method to identify target population | 53% | 100% | 65% |
Inclusion criteria | 71% | 75% | 72% |
Exclusion criteria | 32% | 58% | 39% |
Participation rate | 47% | 67% | 52% |
Characteristics of participants and non-participants | 12% | 8% | 11% |
Average across Reach components | 43% | 62% | 48% |
Efficacy/ Effectiveness | Â | Â | Â |
Results for primary outcome | 97% | 100% | 98% |
Intent-to-treat or present at follow up analysis | 88% | 75% | 84% |
Quality-of-life or potential negative outcome measures | 12% | 17% | 13% |
Percent attrition | 85% | 58% | 78% |
Average across Efficacy/Effectiveness components | 69% | 62% | 67% |
Adoption | Â | Â | Â |
Description of intervention location | 35% | 25% | 33% |
Description of staff who delivered intervention | 24% | 8% | 20% |
Method to identify staff who delivered intervention | 9% | 8% | 9% |
Level of expertise of delivery agent | 62% | 42% | 57% |
Inclusion/exclusion criteria of delivery agent or setting | 21% | 8% | 17% |
Adoption rate of delivery agent or Setting | 12% | 25% | 15% |
Average across Adoption components | 27% | 19% | 25% |
Implementation | Â | Â | Â |
Intervention duration and frequency | 94% | 92% | 93% |
Extent protocol delivered as intended | 21% | 17% | 20% |
Measures of cost of implementation | 12% | 8% | 11% |
Average across Implementation components | 42% | 39% | 41% |
Maintenance | Â | Â | Â |
Assessed outcomes >6Â months post intervention | 12% | 8% | 11% |
Indicators of program-level maintenance | 9% | 25% | 13% |
Measures of cost of maintenance | 6% | 8% | 7% |
Average across Maintenance components | 9% | 14% | 10% |