Table 4 Comparison of competitive food policies (beyond state or federal guidelines) of largest school districts in each state and the District of Columbia (2004–2005)
Policy Includes Clause to Address | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State | School District | Policy limited to school hours | Stds differ by grade level | Restricts food content | Restricts food portions | Restricts % sugar in juice drinks | Restricts drink portion | No sodas | Marketing | Nutr. Edu. | PE | Monitoring | Non- Compliance |
CA | Los Angeles Unified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
DE | Christina |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
-- | District of Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
FL | Dade Co. |
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
IL | Chicago |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
KY | Jefferson Co. |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
ME | Portland |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
MA | Boston |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
NV | Clark Co. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
NH | Manchester |
|
| ||||||||||
NY | NYC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
ND | Grand Forks |
|
|
| |||||||||
OR | Portland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
PA | Philadelphia |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
TN | Memphis City Schools |
|
|
| |||||||||
VT | Burlington |
|
|
|
| ||||||||
VA | Fairfax Co. |
| |||||||||||
WA | Seattle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
WI | Milwaukee |
|
|
| |||||||||
Total | 9 | 10 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 2 | |
Percent (n = 19) | 47% | 53% | 74% | 53% | 74% | 47% | 63% | 26% | 32% | 11% | 32% | 11% | |
