Skip to main content

Table 1 Correlations between TBP model constructs. Means and standard deviations (SD) for each construct for the total sample and by gender.

From: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to healthy eating behaviors in urban Native American youth

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Total sample (n = 139)

1. Behavior

1

      

2. Intention

0.05

1

     

3. Attitude

0.44**

0.45**

1

    

4. Subjective norm

0.34**

0.39**

0.48**

1

   

5. Barriers

0.46**

-0.14

0.40**

0.15

1

  

6. Self-efficacy

-0.12

0.56**

0.38**

0.37**

-0.31**

1

 

7. Perceived behavioral control

0.35**

-0.01

0.35**

0.23**

0.57**

-0.04

1

Mean

0.048

0.062

0.023

0.067

-0.021

0.034

0.003

SD

0.034

0.093

0.023

0.079

0.054

0.043

0.097

Boys (n = 58)

       

1. Behavior

1

      

2. Intention

0.15

1

     

3. Attitude

0.45**

0.60**

1

    

4. Subjective norm

0.46**

0.38**

0.58**

1

   

5. Barriers

0.37**

0.13

0.47**

0.37**

1

  

6. Self-efficacy

0.2

0.68**

0.65**

0.38**

0

1

 

7. Perceived behavioral control

0.43**

0.22

0.46**

0.33*

0.59**

0.18

1

Mean

0.05

0.032†

0.023

0.066

-0.006†

0.030†

0.019

SD

0.032

0.09

0.028

0.086

0.056

0.045

0.096

Girls (n = 81)

       

1. Behavior

1

      

2. Intention

0.01

1

     

3. Attitude

0.46**

0.34**

1

    

4. Subjective norm

0.25*

0.41**

0.37**

1

   

5. Barriers

0.52**

-0.26*

0.35**

-0.5

1

  

6. Self-efficacy

-0.34**

0.41**

0.08

0.38**

-0.54**

1

 

7. Perceived behavioral control

0.28*

-0.11

0.25*

0.16

0.53**

-0.16

1

Mean

0.046

0.084†

0.023

0.067

-0.032†

0.046†

-0.009

SD

0.036

0.089

0.02

0.075

0.05

0.039

0.096

  1. * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01 † Mean value significantly different than mean value of boys/girls at p < 0.05.