From: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to healthy eating behaviors in urban Native American youth
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total sample (n = 139) | |||||||
1. Behavior | 1 | ||||||
2. Intention | 0.05 | 1 | |||||
3. Attitude | 0.44** | 0.45** | 1 | ||||
4. Subjective norm | 0.34** | 0.39** | 0.48** | 1 | |||
5. Barriers | 0.46** | -0.14 | 0.40** | 0.15 | 1 | ||
6. Self-efficacy | -0.12 | 0.56** | 0.38** | 0.37** | -0.31** | 1 | |
7. Perceived behavioral control | 0.35** | -0.01 | 0.35** | 0.23** | 0.57** | -0.04 | 1 |
Mean | 0.048 | 0.062 | 0.023 | 0.067 | -0.021 | 0.034 | 0.003 |
SD | 0.034 | 0.093 | 0.023 | 0.079 | 0.054 | 0.043 | 0.097 |
Boys (n = 58) | |||||||
1. Behavior | 1 | ||||||
2. Intention | 0.15 | 1 | |||||
3. Attitude | 0.45** | 0.60** | 1 | ||||
4. Subjective norm | 0.46** | 0.38** | 0.58** | 1 | |||
5. Barriers | 0.37** | 0.13 | 0.47** | 0.37** | 1 | ||
6. Self-efficacy | 0.2 | 0.68** | 0.65** | 0.38** | 0 | 1 | |
7. Perceived behavioral control | 0.43** | 0.22 | 0.46** | 0.33* | 0.59** | 0.18 | 1 |
Mean | 0.05 | 0.032† | 0.023 | 0.066 | -0.006† | 0.030† | 0.019 |
SD | 0.032 | 0.09 | 0.028 | 0.086 | 0.056 | 0.045 | 0.096 |
Girls (n = 81) | |||||||
1. Behavior | 1 | ||||||
2. Intention | 0.01 | 1 | |||||
3. Attitude | 0.46** | 0.34** | 1 | ||||
4. Subjective norm | 0.25* | 0.41** | 0.37** | 1 | |||
5. Barriers | 0.52** | -0.26* | 0.35** | -0.5 | 1 | ||
6. Self-efficacy | -0.34** | 0.41** | 0.08 | 0.38** | -0.54** | 1 | |
7. Perceived behavioral control | 0.28* | -0.11 | 0.25* | 0.16 | 0.53** | -0.16 | 1 |
Mean | 0.046 | 0.084† | 0.023 | 0.067 | -0.032† | 0.046† | -0.009 |
SD | 0.036 | 0.089 | 0.02 | 0.075 | 0.05 | 0.039 | 0.096 |