Skip to main content

Table 6 Results of testing the mediational model: energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs) as mediators of the relationship between ethnicity and BMI (criteria 3 and 4)

From: Ethnic differences in BMI among Dutch adolescents: what is the role of screen-viewing, active commuting to school, and consumption of soft drinks and high-caloric snacks?

 

unstandardized regression coefficient (95% CI)

% mediation

SE*

Sobel

z-value

P value (Sobel)

boys

     

BMI: ethnicity and EBRBs (criteria 3 and 4) †

     

television viewing

1.45 (.69 – 2.21)

5.8

.39

2.73

.006

active transport to school

1.49 (.75 – 2.23)

3.3

.38

2.81

.005

fruit juices consumption

1.29 (.43 – 2.16)

16.2

.44

2.35

.02

savoury snacks consumption

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

BMI: ethnicity and all EBRBs‡

1. 16 (.28 – 2.05)

24.7

.45

2.15

.03

girls

     

BMI: ethnicity and EBRBs (criteria 3 and 4) †

     

Television viewing

1.55 (.68 – 2.42)

16.7

.44

2.66

.008

active transport to school

1.75 (.87 – 2.62)

5.9

.44

2.86

.004

fruit juices consumption

2.22 (1.23 – 3.21)

S

.50

3.02

.003

savoury snacks consumption

1.75 (.89 – 2.61)

5.9

.44

2.86

.004

BMI: ethnicity and all EBRBs‡

1.39 (.42 – 2.37)

25.3

.50

2.28

.02

  1. *SE = standard error
  2. †regression model with BMI as the criterion variable and EBRBs and ethnicity as predictor variables
  3. ‡regression model with BMI as the criterion variable and television viewing, active transport to school, fruit juices, and savoury snacks (girls only)
  4. NA = not applicable
  5. S = suppression effect