Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression models showing whether intervention students maintained or increased their advantage, relative to controls in terms of performance of each skill to mastery/near mastery level (MNM) at follow-up; controlling for MNM level at end of intervention, gender and grade

From: Six year follow-up of students who participated in a school-based physical activity intervention: a longitudinal cohort study

Skills        95% CI
   Beta SE Wald P Odds ratio Lower Upper
Catch Intercept 1.80 .57 9.86 .002    
  MNM in 2000 .40 .45 .77 .380 1.49 .61 3.61
  Grade -1.23 .54 5.24 .022 .29 .10 .84
  Gender .97 .48 4.01 .045 2.63 1.02 6.78
  Intervention status 1.71 .53 10.39 .001 5.51 1.95 15.55
Throw Intercept 2.36 .42 31.92 .000    
  MNM in 2000 .47 .39 1.47 .226 1.60 .75 3.41
  Grade -2.13 .36 34.27 .000 .12 .06 .24
  Gender -.21 .32 .00 .948 .98 .53 1.83
  Intervention status -.84 .33 6.57 .010 .43 .23 .82
Kick Intercept 1.86 .42 19.40 .000    
  MNM in 2000 .66 .37 3.07 .080 1.93 .93 4.00
  Grade -2.69 .37 52.78 .000 .07 .03 .14
  Gender .09 .32 .07 .787 1.09 .58 2.06
  Intervention status -.93 .35 7.05 .008 .39 .20 .78
Jump Intercept 1.07 .37 8.19 .004    
  MNM in 2000 1.19 .51 5.51 .019 3.27 1.22 8.81
  Grade .27 .36 .56 .456 1.31 .64 2.68
  Gender .33 .36 .82 .364 1.39 .68 2.84
  Intervention status .14 .36 .14 .712 1.14 .56 2.34
Gallop Intercept 2.32 .48 23.29 .000    
  MNM in 2000 .04 .41 .01 .932 1.04 .46 2.31
  Grade -.50 .43 1.37 .242 .61 .26 1.40
  Gender -.20 .41 .24 .623 .82 .37 1.82
  Intervention status .21 .42 .26 .613 1.24 .55 2.79
  1. Note: Reference categories were: 'Male', 'Yr 10', 'Control' and '0 Skill'