Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression models showing whether intervention students maintained or increased their advantage, relative to controls in terms of performance of each skill to mastery/near mastery level (MNM) at follow-up; controlling for MNM level at end of intervention, gender and grade

From: Six year follow-up of students who participated in a school-based physical activity intervention: a longitudinal cohort study

Skills

      

95% CI

  

Beta

SE

Wald

P

Odds ratio

Lower

Upper

Catch

Intercept

1.80

.57

9.86

.002

   
 

MNM in 2000

.40

.45

.77

.380

1.49

.61

3.61

 

Grade

-1.23

.54

5.24

.022

.29

.10

.84

 

Gender

.97

.48

4.01

.045

2.63

1.02

6.78

 

Intervention status

1.71

.53

10.39

.001

5.51

1.95

15.55

Throw

Intercept

2.36

.42

31.92

.000

   
 

MNM in 2000

.47

.39

1.47

.226

1.60

.75

3.41

 

Grade

-2.13

.36

34.27

.000

.12

.06

.24

 

Gender

-.21

.32

.00

.948

.98

.53

1.83

 

Intervention status

-.84

.33

6.57

.010

.43

.23

.82

Kick

Intercept

1.86

.42

19.40

.000

   
 

MNM in 2000

.66

.37

3.07

.080

1.93

.93

4.00

 

Grade

-2.69

.37

52.78

.000

.07

.03

.14

 

Gender

.09

.32

.07

.787

1.09

.58

2.06

 

Intervention status

-.93

.35

7.05

.008

.39

.20

.78

Jump

Intercept

1.07

.37

8.19

.004

   
 

MNM in 2000

1.19

.51

5.51

.019

3.27

1.22

8.81

 

Grade

.27

.36

.56

.456

1.31

.64

2.68

 

Gender

.33

.36

.82

.364

1.39

.68

2.84

 

Intervention status

.14

.36

.14

.712

1.14

.56

2.34

Gallop

Intercept

2.32

.48

23.29

.000

   
 

MNM in 2000

.04

.41

.01

.932

1.04

.46

2.31

 

Grade

-.50

.43

1.37

.242

.61

.26

1.40

 

Gender

-.20

.41

.24

.623

.82

.37

1.82

 

Intervention status

.21

.42

.26

.613

1.24

.55

2.79

  1. Note: Reference categories were: 'Male', 'Yr 10', 'Control' and '0 Skill'