Table 1 Per SIMD Income quintile: number of retailers; mean number per 1,000 residents; mean distance to nearest
From: The food retail environment and area deprivation in Glasgow City, UK
| Â | Â | Number | Mean N per 1000 residents | Mean distance (metres) to nearest retailer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
All food retailers | Â | Â | Â | Â |
SIMD Quintile | 1 Least deprived | 118 | 0.99 | 504 |
| Â | 2 | 227 | 1.87 | 379 |
| Â | 3 Middling | 218 | 1.89 | 361 |
| Â | 4 | 163 | 1.44 | 412 |
| Â | 5 Most Deprived | 208 | 1.94 | 445 |
| Â | Total | 934 | 1.63 | 420 |
| Â | Â | Chi2 | F = 3.46 p = 0.008 | F = 4.47 p = 0.001 |
| Â | Â | Linearity | F = 4.45 p = 0.035 | F = 0.99 p = 0.319 |
Bakers | Â | Â | Â | Â |
SIMD Quintile | 1 Least deprived | 12 | 0.09 | 1329 |
| Â | 2 | 12 | 0.09 | 1238 |
| Â | 3 Middling | 15 | 0.13 | 1383 |
| Â | 4 | 8 | 0.07 | 1536 |
| Â | 5 Most Deprived | 14 | 0.11 | 1559 |
| Â | Total | 61 | 0.10 | 1409 |
| Â | Â | Chi2 | F = 0.62 p = 0.651 | F = 2.27 p = 0.060 |
| Â | Â | Linearity | F = 0.04 p = 0.852 | F = 6.97 p = 0.008 |
Butchers | Â | Â | Â | Â |
SIMD Quintile | 1 Least deprived | 9 | 0.07 | 1204 |
| Â | 2 | 29 | 0.24 | 1090 |
| Â | 3 Middling | 22 | 0.20 | 1047 |
| Â | 4 | 11 | 0.09 | 1102 |
| Â | 5 Most Deprived | 23 | 0.22 | 1113 |
| Â | Total | 94 | 0.16 | 1111 |
| Â | Â | Chi2 | F = 2.99 p = 0.018 | F = 0.91 p = 0.456 |
| Â | Â | Linearity | F = 1.09 p = 0.297 | F = 0.79 p = 0.375 |
F&V sellers | Â | Â | Â | Â |
SIMD Quintile | 1 Least deprived | 5 | 0.04 | 1746 |
| Â | 2 | 8 | 0.06 | 1716 |
| Â | 3 Middling | 7 | 0.06 | 1611 |
| Â | 4 | 4 | 0.04 | 1512 |
| Â | 5 Most Deprived | 12 | 0.12 | 1558 |
| Â | Total | 36 | 0.06 | 1629 |
| Â | Â | Chi2 | F = 1.51 p = 0.198 | F = 1.44 p = 0.220 |
| Â | Â | Linearity | F = 2.12 p = 0.146 | F = 4.80 p = 0.029 |
Fishmongers | Â | Â | Â | Â |
SIMD Quintile | 1 Least deprived | 1 | 0.01 | 2401 |
| Â | 2 | 3 | 0.02 | 2455 |
| Â | 3 Middling | 5 | 0.05 | 2547 |
| Â | 4 | 3 | 0.03 | 2732 |
| Â | 5 Most Deprived | 4 | 0.03 | 3076 |
| Â | Total | 16 | 0.03 | 2641 |
| Â | Â | Chi2 | F = 0.78 p = 0.541 | F = 3.56 p = 0.007 |
| Â | Â | Linearity | F = 0.88 p = 0.350 | F = 12.61 p = 0.000 |
Convenience stores | Â | Â | Â | Â |
SIMD Quintile | 1 Most Affluent | 75 | 0.64 | 538 |
| Â | 2 | 153 | 1.28 | 408 |
| Â | 3 Middling | 145 | 1.25 | 381 |
| Â | 4 | 126 | 1.13 | 434 |
| Â | 5 Most Deprived | 138 | 1.31 | 486 |
| Â | Total | 637 | 1.12 | 449 |
| Â | Â | Chi2 | F = 3.65 p = 0.006 | F = 4.57 p = 0.001 |
| Â | Â | Linearity | F = 6.75 p = 0.010 | F = 0.69 p = 0.403 |
Supermarkets | Â | Â | Â | Â |
SIMD Quintile | 1 Most Affluent | 10 | 0.08 | 1098 |
| Â | 2 | 14 | 0.11 | 1078 |
| Â | 3 Middling | 20 | 0.17 | 1215 |
| Â | 4 | 10 | 0.08 | 1350 |
| Â | 5 Most Deprived | 14 | 0.12 | 1569 |
| Â | Total | 68 | 0.11 | 1262 |
| Â | Â | Chi2 | F = 0.74 p = 0.568 | F = 8.02 p = 0.000 |
| Â | Â | Linearity | F = 0.16 p = 0.692 | F = 28.68 p = 0.000 |
Delicatessens | Â | Â | Â | Â |
SIMD Quintile | 1 Most Affluent | 5 | 0.05 | 1812 |
| Â | 2 | 6 | 0.05 | 1679 |
| Â | 3 Middling | 5 | 0.04 | 1948 |
| Â | 4 | 1 | 0.01 | 2174 |
| Â | 5 Most Deprived | 5 | 0.04 | 2136 |
| Â | Total | 22 | 0.04 | 1950 |
| Â | Â | Chi2 | F = 0.88 p = 0.474 | F = 4.42 p = 0.002 |
| Â | Â | Linearity | F = 0.61 p = 0.433 | F = 13.04 p = 0.000 |