Skip to main content

Table 2 Overall Efficacy of Prediction of Behaviour According to Methodological Factors

From: Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable intake in adult population: a systematic review

 

Fruit and Vegetable Intake

Fruit Intake

Vegetable Intake

 

Nb of Participants (Nb of Studies)

Random-Effect R2

Nb of Participants (Nb of Studies)

Random-Effect R2

Nb of Participants (Nb of Studies)

Random-Effect R2

Study Design

      

   Cross-sectional

30733 (13)

0.18

8337(9)

0.17

8337 (9)

0.14

   Longitudinal

1142 (3)

0.51

783(2)

0.29

-

-

Level of Correspondence

      

   Low

4818 (5)

0.33

7811 (7)

0.15

7811 (7)

0.15

   Good

27057 (11)

0.20

1309 (4)

0.28

526 (2)

0.101

Psychometric Quality of Psychosocial Variables

      

   Low

6233 (3)

0.17

3680 (3)

0.12

3680 (3)

0.14

   Good

25642 (13)

0.25

5440 (8)

0.22

4657 (6)

0.14

Quality of Behavioural Measures

      

   Low

1360 (2)

0.161

291 (1)

0.18

291 (1)

0.08

   Good

30515 (14)

0.25

8829(10)

0.19

8046 (8)

0.15

Samples

      

   Women and Men

25623 (10)

0.29

7224 (6)

0.22

6441 (4)

0.17

   Women

2707 (3)

0.17

1164 (3)

0.20

1164 (3)

0.12

   Men

3545 (3)

0.12

732 (2)

0.12

732 (2)

0.10

  1. Note: Dashes indicate that no study was concerned.
  2. 1Non-significant heterogeneity. Significant heterogeneity was detected using Q test (p < 0.05) and degree of heterogeneity I2 > 75% in all other analyses.