Skip to main content

Table 1 Effect sizes of intervention outcomes

From: Adding effect sizes to a systematic review on interventions for promoting physical activity among European teenagers

Study/country

E1

M2

Q3

Outcome measures

Cohen's

d 4

School setting

Haerens et al. (2007) [12], Belgium

N

N

3

Total PA level (min/day)

-0.01

 
    

School-related PA (min/day)

0.14

 
    

Leisure time sport (min/day)

-0.09

 
    

Leisure time active transportation (min/day)

0.05

 

Verstraete et al. (2006) [13], Belgium

Y

N

2

Low intensity PA (% time spent during morning recess)

-0.30

*

    

Moderate intensity PA (% time spent during morning recess)

0.53

**

    

Vigorous intensity PA (% time spent during morning recess)

-0.12

 
    

Moderate to vigorous PA (% time spent during morning recess)

0.35

*

    

Low intensity PA (% time spent during lunch break)

-1.06

***

    

Moderate intensity PA (% time spent during lunch break)

0.89

***

    

Vigorous intensity PA (% time spent during lunch break)

0.54

**

    

Moderate to vigorous PA (% time spent during lunch break)

1.00

***

Hill et al. (2007) [11], UK

N

N

2

Exercise sessions min. 30 min/week without PE (leaflet only)

0.18

 
    

Exercise sessions min. 30 min/week without PE (leaflet plus quiz)

0.45

*

    

Exercise sessions min. 30 min/week without PE (leaflet + implementation intention prompt)

0.32

*

Tsorbatzoudis (2005) [14], Greece

N

N

2

End of intervention: exercise habits (score)

0.59

**

Lubans and Sylva (2006) [15], UK

N

N

1

End of intervention: moderate to vigorous PA (min/week) of 20 min. or longer

0.65

*

Murphy et al. (2006) [16], Ireland

Y

N

1

 

x

 

Lindberg et al. (2006) [17], Sweden

N

Y

1

 

x

 

Chatzisarantis and Hagger (2005) [18], UK

N

N

1

Frequency of mild, moderate and vigorous PA during leisure time in the last 5 weeks

0.08

 

Digelidis et al. (2003) [19], Greece

Y

Y

1

End of intervention: frequency of regular exercise in the previous month

-0.04

 

School setting with involvement of family

Harrison et al. (2006) [20], Ireland

Y

N

3

Moderate to vigorous PA: principal PA + intensity (30 min blocks/day)

2.07

****

Haerens et al. (2007) [21], Belgium

Y

N

2

Total PA level (min/day)

0.12

 
    

School-related PA (min/day)

0.39

*

    

Leisure time sport (min/day)

-0.02

 
    

Leisure time active transportation (min/day)

0.07

 
    

Subsample accelerometer data: PA of light intensity (min/day)

0.53

**

    

Subsample accelerometer data: PA of moderate to vigorous intensity (min/day)

0.50

**

Christodoulos et al. (2006) [10], Greece

Y

N

2

Organised moderate to vigorous PA (h/week)

3.53

****

    

Total moderate to vigorous PA (h/week)

2.79

****

School setting with involvement of family and community

Simon et al. (2006) [22], France

Y

N

2

Leisure supervised PA (%)

0.56

**

Jurg et al. (2006) [23], The Netherlands

Y

N

1

Total PA score (min/day at least moderately active)

0.11

 
    

Meeting the guidelines: 60 min/day of moderate PA (%)

0.27

*

Moon et al. (1999) [24], UK

Y

Y

1

Taking part in sports at school (not PE) once or more a week (%)

-0.02

 

Community with involvement of schools

Baxter et al. (1997) [25], UK

Y

Y

2

Students that exercise 3 or more times weekly (%)

0.40

*

Primary care

Ortega-Sanchez et al. (2004) [26], Spain

N

N

1

6 months after 1st session: duration (min/week)

0.28

*

    

6 months after 1st session: frequency (days/week)

0.17

 
    

6 months after 1st session: intensity in points (mild = 1, moderate = 2, vigorous = 3)

0.32

*

    

12 months after 1st session: duration (min/week)

0.37

*

    

12 months after 1st session: frequency (days/week)

0.25

*

    

12 months after 1st session: intensity in points (mild = 1, moderate = 2, vigorous = 3)

0.44

*

Walker et al. (1999) [27], UK

N

Y

1

Teenagers who reported positive behaviour change (% 3 months after intervention)

0.14

 

Kelleher et al. (1999) [28], Ireland

N

Y

1

Exercise (times/week) by 12-15 years old

< 0.01

 

Individual

Woods et al. (2002) [29], Scotland

N

N

2

Membership of the Sport and Recreation Service at the university (%)

0.61

**

  1. 1Intervention includes environmental components: Y(es)/N(o)
  2. 2Intervention aims to affect more health behaviours besides physical activity: Y(es)/N(o)
  3. 3Global rating quality assessment: three-grade scale (3 = strong; 2 = moderate; 1 = weak)
  4. 4Classification of effect sizes: trivial (Cohen's d ≤ .2); * small (Cohen's d > .2); ** moderate (Cohen's d > .5); *** large (Cohen's d > .8); **** very large (Cohen's d > 1.3)
  5. xImpossible to calculate effect size based on reported results