Skip to main content

Table 2 Means and standard deviations of psychosocial scales and dietary intake estimates for Study 2.

From: Reliability and validity of brief psychosocial measures related to dietary behaviors

 

# Items

Men (n = 441)

Women (n = 401)

  

Mean (SD)

alpha

Mean (SD)

alpha

Dietary Fat Reduction

     

   Pros

4

3.63 (.74)

.59

3.76 (.86)

.72

   Cons

4

2.57 (.81)

.67

2.50 (.87)

.72

   Self-efficacy

5

2.78 (.82)

.85

2.72 (.94)

.89

   % energy from fat

 

37.7 (6.5)

 

35.4 (7.2)

 

Dietary Fiber and Whole Grains

     

   Pros

4

3.11 (.87)

.73

3.57 (.95)

.80

   Cons

4

1.73 (.65)

.53

1.98 (.78)

.63

   Self-efficacy

8

3.27 (.77)

.86

3.17 (.86)

.89

   Dietary fiber grams per 1000 kcal

 

8.86 (2.59)

 

9.28 (2.99)

 

Fruit & Vegetable

     

   Pros

4

3.70 (.80)

.68

3.81 (.80)

.71

   Cons

4

2.16 (.70)

.51

2.16 (.73)

.54

   Self-efficacy

6

3.17 (.79)

.79

3.37 (.87)

.83

   Fruit servings per 1000 kcal

 

0.59 (.46)

 

0.92 (.76)

 

   Vegetable servings per 1000 kcal

 

0.67 (.44)

 

1.24 (.91)

 

Healthy Eating

     

   Change strategies

15

2.53 (.66)

.89

2.80 (.73)

.90

   Social Support

6

2.52 (.99)

.89

2.52 (1.15)

.85

   Environment

4

3.94 (.73)

.69

4.07 (.72)

.68

   Enjoyment

7

3.82 (.67)

.72

3.94 (.66)

.68

  1. Note: Scores for each scale have a possible range of 1-5.