Table 3 Cross-sectional regression model
Step |  | R-square Δ | Beta | T-value | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Â | .058 | Â | Â | Â |
| Â | Gender | Â | -.155 | -5.23 | .000 |
| Â | Age | Â | .134 | 4.44 | .000 |
| Â | Marital status | Â | .025 | .833 | .405 |
| Â | Employment status | Â | -.001 | -.024 | .981 |
| Â | Education | Â | -.001 | -.030 | .976 |
| Â | Activity | Â | -.074 | -.2.51 | .012 |
| Â | Fruit and vegetable intake | Â | -.073 | -2.50 | .012 |
2 | Â | .010 | Â | Â | Â |
| Â | Gender | Â | -.146 | -4.92 | .000 |
| Â | Age | Â | .130 | 4.23 | .000 |
| Â | Marital status | Â | .036 | 1.20 | .230 |
| Â | Employment status | Â | .007 | 0.22 | .822 |
| Â | Education | Â | -.007 | -0.25 | .801 |
| Â | Activity | Â | -.066 | -2.25 | .028 |
| Â | Fruit and vegetable intake | Â | -.066 | -2.21 | .025 |
| Â | Close to job | Â | -.042 | -1.37 | .170 |
| Â | Close to outdoor recreation | Â | -.009 | -0.28 | .778 |
| Â | Quality of schools | Â | -.029 | -0.94 | .350 |
| Â | Ease of walking | Â | -.029 | -0.93 | .035 |
3 | Â | .009 | Â | Â | Â |
| Â | Gender | Â | -.146 | -4.94 | .000 |
| Â | Age | Â | .135 | 4.41 | .000 |
| Â | Marital status | Â | .042 | 1.40 | .161 |
| Â | Employment status | Â | .011 | 0.36 | .717 |
| Â | Education | Â | .006 | 0.20 | .838 |
| Â | Activity | Â | -.068 | -2.28 | .023 |
| Â | Fruit and vegetable intake | Â | -.059 | -2.03 | .043 |
| Â | Close to job | Â | -.043 | -1.39 | .164 |
| Â | Close to outdoor recreation | Â | -.010 | -0.30 | .765 |
| Â | Quality of schools | Â | -.027 | -0.86 | .393 |
| Â | Ease of walking | Â | -.061 | -1.93 | .057 |
| Â | Neighbourhood walkability | Â | -.051 | -1.69 | .091 |
| Â | Neighbourhood SES | Â | -.097 | -3.18 | .002 |