Distribution of physical activity facilities in Scotland by small area measures of deprivation and urbanicity

Table 3 Density of PA facilities for Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh and Glasgow.

Local authority		Number of DZs	Number of PA facilities	Mean number of facilities per 1,000 residents (95% C.I.)
Aberdeen
Income SIMD quintile	1 (most affluent)	90	108	1.48 (1.07, 1.90)
	2	43	68	1.91 (1.18, 2.64)
	3 (middling)	45	127	3.56 (2.34, 4.77)
	4	57	85	1.83 (1.22, 2.45)
	5 (most deprived)	32	32	1.31 (0.66, 1.95)
	Total	267	420	1.89 (1.57, 2.21)
				p = 0.001
*Dundee*
Income SIMD quintile	1 (most affluent)	30	63	2.53 (1.43, 3.64)
	2	23	71	3.55 (1.87, 5.24)
	3 (middling)	15	32	3.18 (1.22, 5.13)
	4	35	39	1.37 (0.75, 2.00)
	5 (most deprived)	76	63	1.04 (0.69, 1.38)
	Total	179	268	2.10 (1.66, 2.54)
				p < 0.001
*Edinburgh*
Income SIMD quintile	1 (most affluent)	190	321	1.94 (1.59, 2.29)
	2	122	222	2.29 (1.78, 2.79)
	3 (middling)	83	150	2.23 (1.63, 2.82)
	4	73	111	1.93 (1.36, 2.50)
	5 (most deprived)	81	122	1.80 (1.29, 2.30)
	Total	549	926	2.03 (1.80, 2.26)
				p = 0.623
Glasgow
Income SIMD quintile	1 (most affluent)	29	43	1.60 (0.84, 2.35)
	2	82	78	1.16 (0.80, 1.53)
	3 (middling)	84	69	0.98 (0.67, 1.30)
	4	128	114	1.09 (0.82, 1.37)
	5 (most deprived)	371	362	1.18 (1.01, 1.35)
	Total	694	666	1.19 (1.02, 1.36)
				p = 0.553

P-values presented indicate whether or not a statistically significant difference is present between at least one pair of deprivation quintiles.

ISSN: 1479-5868