Skip to main content

Table 2 Demographic characteristics of the baseline sample and study cohort by intervention and comparison areas, and those lost to follow-up

From: The effectiveness of community-based cycling promotion: findings from the Cycling Connecting Communitiesproject in Sydney, Australia

 

Baseline (n = 1140)

Cohort (n = 909)

Lost to follow-up

(n = 541)

Characteristic

Intervention

Comparison

Total

Intervention

Comparison

Total

Total

 

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

SEX

       

Male

40.2

41.9

40.9

39.8

39.9

39.8

42.7

Female

59.9

58.1

59.1

60.2

60.2

60.2

57.3

AGE

       

18-29

17.2

16.5

16.9

14.4

12.7

13.7

22.3*

30-44

33.2

26.9

30.5

32.5

26.1

29.8

31.6

45-60

27.2

25.1

26.3

29.0

24.3

27.0

25.1

61+

22.4

31.5

26.4

24.0

37.0*

29.6

21.0*

EDUCATION

       

No formal

8.8

8.0

8.4

7.9

7.2

7.6

9.9

School Certificate

24.1

19.8

22.3

25.4

19.3

22.8

21.4

HSC

18.3

17.4

17.9

17.9

16.2

17.2

19.1

Trade

26.3

22.0

24.5

26.2

24.9

25.6

22.5

University

25.9

16.9

20.8

17.7

26.0

21.2

20.1

Other

4.8

6.2

5.4

5.0

6.5

5.6

6.7

CURRENTLY STUDYING

       

Yes

13.3

14.8

13.9

11.0

13.1

11.9

17.4*

COUNTRY OF BIRTH

       

Australia

47.3

43.2

45.5

55.4

61.4

58.0

48.5*

EMPLOYMENT

       

Full-time

39.1

32.1

36.1

39.7

29.3

35.2

37.5

Part-time

11.7

11.6

11.7

12.5

14.4

13.3

8.8

Keeping house

11.6

11.7

11.7

11.4

9.3

10.5

13.7

Aged pension

11.4

11.9

11.6

12.7

12.6

12.7

9.8

Other

26.2

32.7

28.9

23.7

34.4

28.3

30.2

  1. * p < 0.05