Skip to main content

Table 6 Intervention effects on MOPER fitness test scores for girls.

From: Effectiveness of a school-based physical activity-related injury prevention program on risk behavior and neuromotor fitness a cluster randomized controlled trial

GIRLS

Intervention group

Control group

Adjusted a difference between groups

 

Baseline

(mean ± SD)

Follow-up

(mean ± SD)

Baseline

(mean ± SD)

Follow-up

(mean ± SD)

β

(95%CI)

Bent arm hang (sec)

Median (25-75 IQR)

6 (3 - 13)

8 (3 - 15)

6 (2 - 13)

6 (2 - 12)

2.08 †

(-0.34-3.83)

10 × 5 run

(sec)

20.0 ± 1.5

19.3 ± 1.6

20.0 ± 1.6

19.7 ± 1.5

-0.33 † *

(-0.50- -0.16)

Leg lift

(sec)

16.7 ± 1.3

16.4 ± 1.3

17.3 ± 1.4

16.9 ± 1.4

-0.80 †

(-1.83-0.23)

Plate tapping

(sec)

14.7 ± 1.8

13.4 ± 1.8

14.8 ± 1.9

13.5 ± 1.7

-0.17 †

(-0.47-0.14)

Sit and reach

(cm)

30 ± 6

30 ± 7

30 ± 6

30 ± 7

0.47 †

(-0.39-1.32)

Arm pull

(kg/kg weight)

61 ± 4

67 ± 5

62 ± 2

64 ± 6

3.44 †

(-1.64-8.51)

Standing high jump (cm)

37 ± 6

38 ± 7

36 ± 7

36 ± 7

0.82 †

(-0.47-2.10)

Flamingo (attempts)

8 ± 3

7 ± 3

8 ± 3

7 ± 3

0.09

(-0.27-0.46)

  1. a adjusted for baseline value, SES and BMI.
  2. † changes in favor of the intervention group.
  3. * significant differences between intervention and control group.