Associations between children's social functioning and physical activity participation are not mediated by social acceptance: a cross-sectional study

Table 3 Linear regression models predicting physical activity from social functioning in boys and girls.

	Boys			Girls
Outcome variable = MVPA⁶ per day
Variable	B¹	SE²	95% CI³	B	SE	95% CI
IMD⁴ score	.08	.08	[-.07, .24]	.04	.04	[-.03, .12]
Daylight	.00**	.00	[.00, .00]	.00**	.00	[.00, .00]
SDQ⁵ Conduct problems	1.63*	.69	[.23, 3.03]	.83	.53	[-.26, 1.91]
SDQ Prosocial	-.38	.71	[-1.82, 1.10]	-.42	.34	[-1.11, .27]
SDQ Peer problems	-1.79*	.68	[-3.18, -.40]	-.55	.46	[-1.48, .38]
	R² for model = .09			R² for model = .06
Outcome variable = CPM⁷ per day
Variable	B	SE	95% CI	B	SE	95% CI
IMD score	-.13	.56	[-1.26, 1.01]	-.00	.52	[-1.05, 1.05]
Daylight	.01*	.00	[.00, .01]	.01**	.00	[.00, .01]
SDQ Conduct problems	14.23**	4.11	[5.91, 22.56]	9.85†	5.57	[-1.43, 21.14]
SDQ Prosocial	-1.73	5.90	[13.69, 10.24]	-.23	4.91	[-10.18, 9.72]
SDQ Peer problems	-15.44**	5.56	[-26.70, 4.18]	-.91	5.10	[-11.22, 9.41]
	R² for model = .13			R² for model = .08
Outcome variable = MVPA after school
Variable	B	SE	95% CI	B	SE	95% CI
IMD score	.06*	.03	[.00, .11]	.02	.02	[-.01, .05]
Daylight	.00	.00	[-.00, .00]	-.00	.00	[-.00, .00]
SDQ Conduct problems	.30	.22	[-.15, .75]	.11	.21	[-.32, .55]
SDQ Prosocial	-.26	.23	[-.75, .22]	-.15	.17	[-.51, .21]
SDQ Peer problems	-.79**	.24	[-1.26, -.31]	-.06	.20	[-.47, .35]
	R² for model = .06			R² for model = .01
Outcome variable = CPM after school
Variable	B	SE	95% CI	B	SE	95% CI
IMD score	.80	1.09	[-1.41, 3.00]	.32	1.03	[-1.78, 2.41]
Daylight	.01**	.00	[.00, .01]	.00	.00	[-.00, .01]
SDQ Conduct problems	24.41**	9.58	[4.99, 43.82]	5.14	10.43	[-15.99, 26.28]
SDQ Prosocial	8.07	9.53	[-11.25, 27.38	-7.80	9.33	[-26.72, 11.12]
SDQ Peer problems	-36.61**	9.31	[-55.48, -17.74]	10.62	10.70	[-11.06, 32.30]
	R² for model = .11			R² for model = .02

ISSN: 1479-5868