Skip to main content

Table 3 Daily activity-related energy expenditure as a proportion (mean [SD]; median (IQR)) of total energy expenditure by employment statusab.

From: Hours spent and energy expended in physical activity domains: Results from The Tomorrow Projectcohort in Alberta, Canada

 

Domains of activities

 

Men (N = 6,131)

Women (N = 9,452)

Employment status

N

Leisure

Occupation

House

All domains

N

Leisure

Occupation

Household

All domains

Full-time

4614

7.2 [6.4]

25.9 [12.2]

6.2 [4.8]

39.6 [10.4]

4123

6.4 [5.8]

20.7 [9.4]

11.7 [6.2]

39.0 [9.3]

  

5.6 (8.7)

24.4 (19.2)

5.2 (5.9)

39.8 (15.0)

 

4.8 (7.2)

19.1 (13.2)

10.5 (7.3)

38.6 (13.1)

Part-time

382

7.4 [7.5]

20.1 [12.2]

7.7 [6.2]

35.5 [10.8]

2166

6.5 [5.7]

14.8 [9.4]

15.4 [7.7]

36.8 [9.6]

  

5.4 (8.5)

18.3 (18.4)

6.2 (7.0)

35.0 (14.2)

 

5.0 (7.0)

13.3 (13.2)

13.8 (8.8)

36.5 (13.2)

Not employed/homemaker/student/other

372

7.2 [7.2]

19.7 [16.4]

8.8 [7.4]

35.9 [13.6]

1855

6.5 [6.1]

7.2 [10.7]

21.3 [10.7]

35.0 [11.6]

  

5.0 (9.8)

17.7 (29.5)

7.2 (9.3)

37.1 (20.2)

 

4.9 (7.8)

1.9 (10.5)

19.6 (14.0)

34.6 (16.2)

Retired

763

10.8 [8.5]

6.5 [10.6]

11.6 [8.7]

28.9 [11.8]

1308

7.7 [6.7]

4.0 [7.3]

18.9 [8.7]

30.7 [10.4]

  

9.1 (11.9)

0.9 (9.0)

9.6 (11.8)

28.4 (15.3)

 

5.9 (8.5)

0.7 (4.6)

17.7 (10.7)

30.0 (13.4)

Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests

 

P<.001

P<.001

P<.001

  

P<.001

P<.001

P<.001

 
  1. a Includes people recruited in the first six recruitment waves (February 2001-January 2005) but excludes people who did not return a PYTPAQ (n = 2,405), pregnant women (n = 31), people who were recruited as 'second in household' in the first recruitment wav e (n = 344), people with prior history of cancer (n = 33), and people with missing data on body weight or height (n = 39). Note: 3 men and 5 women had missing data on employment status.
  2. b Differences in median or distribution shape between employment status groups for each domain were compared by using Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests and were statistically significant (P<.001), Statistical significance of the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test in each domain can be interpreted as follows: at least one median or distribution shape of the daily activity-related energy expenditure in a particular employment status group significantly differed from another median or distribution shape in another employment status group.