|
Statistics for individual predictors
|
Model statistics
|
---|
Model
| |
Age
|
Pubic hair stage
|
Voice change
|
Pubertal timing
|
BDS
|
Migback × pubic hair stage
|
BDS × age
|
Correct classification
|
Pseudo -2
Log-
Likelihood
|
Wald χ2 (df) corr. for model
|
Nagelkerke's pseudo R2
|
---|
0 #
|
Wald χ2 (df) corrected
| | | | | | | |
36.5%
|
9431.11
|
39.09 (13.62)
|
.018
|
|
p-value*
| | | | | | | | | |
< .001
| |
1
|
Wald χ2 (df) corrected
|
68.82 (2.92)
| | | | | | |
37.6%
|
9319.74
|
104.58 (16.06)
|
.050
|
|
p-value*
|
< .001
| | | | | | | | |
< .001
| |
2
|
Wald χ2 (df) corrected
|
22.77 (2.95)
|
4.81 (5.56)
|
1.55 (5.76)
| | | | |
37.7%
|
9310.25
|
104.20 (24.40)
|
.053
|
|
p-value*
|
< .001
|
.836
|
.990
| | | | | | |
< .001
| |
3
|
Wald χ2 (df) corrected
|
34.45 (2.92)
|
7.58 (5.52)
|
5.31 (5.75
|
18.80 (5.54)
| | | |
38.2%
|
9282.33
|
112.61 (27.93)
|
.060
|
|
p-value*
|
< .001
|
.068
|
.284
|
.007
| | | | | |
< .001
| |
4
|
Wald χ2 (df) corrected
|
33.06 (2.91)
|
7.14 (5.51)
|
5.42 (5.74)
|
18.70 (5.56)
|
9.90 (8.44)
| | |
38.5%
|
9267.46
|
115.69 (33.30)
|
.065
|
|
p-value*
|
< .001
|
.084
|
.299
|
.008
|
.022
| | | | |
< .001
| |
5
|
Wald χ2 (df) corrected
|
28.01
(2.90)
|
12.70 (5.67)
|
6.20 (5.75)
|
19.01 (5.54)
|
13.86 (8.13)
|
20.50 (5.75)
|
14.73 (8.15)
|
38.3%
|
9217.06
|
126.10 (40.51)
|
.078
|
|
p-value*
|
< .001
|
.013
|
.258
|
.007
|
.017
|
.024
|
.008
| | |
< .001
| |
- * Adjustment for multiple tests: Šidák sequential
- # model 0 = baseline model including body fat percentage and sociodemographic variables: region, SES, migrant background migback = migrant background
- Each row of the table shows the results of one tested model. Left-hand the test statistics for the independent variables are given while right-hand information on model fit is displayed.
- The corrected Wald chi-square test tests if an individual independent variable (individual predictors) or all independent variables together (model statistics) significantly contribute to the prediction of the dependent variable; it is corrected for the sampling plan.
- Correct classification rate is the proportion of participants for whom the tested model could correctly predict the category of the dependent variable (PA frequency).
- Pseudo -2 Log-Likelihood: In logistic regression models are compared due to their -2 log-likelihood; since for complex samples no likelihood ratio test is available the values are only descriptive; better fitting models have smaller values.
- Nagelkerke's pseudo R2 is a measure of explained variation in the dependent variable that emulates R2 from linear regression.