Skip to main content

Table 3 Multiple regression models for odds of engaging in any walking to work stratified according to car availability within the household

From: Correlates of time spent walking and cycling to and from work: baseline results from the commuting and health in Cambridge study

 

Model B1

Model B2

 

No car

OR (95% CI) p

Car

OR (95% CI) p

No car

OR (95% CI) p

Car

OR (95% CI) p

Individual and household characteristics

    

   Gender (reference: male)

    

   Female

2.18 (1.03-4.64) 0.041

1.74 (1.24-2.44) 0.001

1.96 (0.92-4.17) 0.080

1.80 (1.26-2.56) 0.005

Driving licence (reference: no)

Yes

0.37 (0.18-0.74) 0.005

0.44 (0.23-0.81) 0.010

0.40 (0.19-0.81) 0.012

0.54 (0.28-1.02) 0.060

   Distance (reference: lives < 3 km from work)

    

   Lives ≥ 3 km from work

0.28 (0.13-0.60) 0.001

0.48 (0.29-0.79) 0.004

0.36 (0.17-0.77) 0.009

0.63 (0.38-1.06) 0.08

Psychological measures of car use

    

   Attitude score (reference: low attitude)

    

   Mid attitude score

0.60 (0.23-1.59) 0.313

1.19 (0.77-1.84) 0.409

-

-

   High attitude score

1.73 (0.61-4.88) 0.300

1.50 (0.97-2.32) 0.067

  

   PBC score (reference: low PBC)

    

   Mid PBC score

0.50 (0.19-1.30) 0.158

0.89 (0.59-1.35) 0.599

-

-

   High PBC score

0.55 (0.03-8.29) 0.669

0.56 (0.35-0.90) 0.017

  

Perceptions of the route environment a

    

   It is pleasant to walk

-

-

4.73 (1.67-13.37) 0.003

4.12 (2.93-5.81) 0.001

   There is convenient public transport

-

-

1.66 (0.82-23.36) 0.158

1.45 (1.05-1.99) 0.022

   There is little traffic

-

-

0.44 (0.15-1.50) 0.211

0.36 (0.18-0.72) 0.004

  1. CI confidence intervals; p p-value; PBC Perceived behavioural control; - not entered into the model; a the reference category is strongly disagree, disagree or neither disagree nor agree.