|
author
|
number
|
baseline weight (kg)
|
endpoint weight (kg)
|
baseline BMI (kg/m2)
|
endpoint BMI (kg/m2)
|
changes in weight (kg)
|
changes in BMI (kg/m2)
|
|---|
|
Scocco et al. [62]1
|
10
|
75,33
|
76,32
|
27,53
| |
0,99 NS
| |
|
Evans et al. [64]
|
29
|
82,80
|
84,80
|
28,80
|
29,50
|
2,00 NI
|
0,70 NI
|
|
Littrell et al. [59]
|
35
|
81,12
|
81,49
|
26,26
|
26,39
|
0,37 NS
|
0,13 NS
|
|
Vreeland et al. [68]
|
31
|
100,20
|
97,48
|
34,32
|
33,34
|
-2,72 NI
|
-0,98 NI
|
|
Weber & Wyne [58]
|
8
|
86,64
|
84,20
|
33,00
|
32,05
|
-2,44 NS
|
-0,95 NS
|
|
McKibbin et al. [61]
|
32
|
100,83
|
98,52
|
33,60
|
32,90
|
-2,31 NI
|
-0,70 NI
|
|
Wu et al. [65]
|
32
|
64,70
|
63,40
|
24,60
|
23,10
|
-1,30 **
|
-1,50 **
|
|
Mauri et al. [63]2
|
22
|
83,90
|
80,30
|
30,00
|
28,70
|
-3,60 **
|
-1,30 **
|
|
Wu et al. [60]
|
28
|
78,40
|
74,20
|
30,43
|
28,84
|
-4,20 *
|
-1,59 *
|
|
Ball et al. [57]
|
21
|
107,91
|
105,60
|
36,90
|
36,20
|
-2,31 NI
|
-0,70 NI
|
|
Skrinar et al. [66]
|
15
|
97,10
|
94,90
|
32,90
|
32,30
|
-2,20 NI
|
-0,60 NI
|
|
Kwon et al. [67]3
|
33
| | |
26,81
|
25,31
|
-3,94 NI
|
-1,50 NI
|
|
Menza et al. [69]
|
31
|
100,20
|
97,20
|
34,30
|
32,60
|
-3,00 **
|
-1,70 **
|
|
Brar et al. [83]4
|
34
|
101,30
|
99,30
| | |
-2,00 **
|
-0,90 **
|
- 1 Scocco et al. (2006): controls received intervention from week 9-24; results presented are the results after 8 weeks
- 2 Mauri et al. (2008): controls received intervention from week 12-24; results presented are the results after 12 weeks
- 3 Kwon et al. (2006): no information on baseline and endpoint weight, only on changes in weight
- 4 Brar et al. (2005): no information on baseline and endpoint BMI, only on changes in BMI
- * significant difference in weight or BMI change from baseline to endpoint in intervention groups (p < .001)
- ** significant difference in weight or BMI change from baseline to endpoint in intervention groups (p < .05)
- Abbreviations: kg = kilogramme; BMI = Body Mass Index; NS = not significant; NI = no information on significance
