Independent associations with percentage weight loss1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
 | Beta | p | Variance explained by engagement R2 change (p) | Variance explained by model Adjusted R2 |
Women | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Food diary engagement | .40 | < .001 | 13% (< .001) | 19% |
Exercise diary engagement | .33 | < .001 | 9% (< .001) | 15% |
Forum use (dichotomised) | .14 | < .001 | 2% (< .001) | 8% |
Men | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Food diary engagement | .49 | < .001 | 18% (< .001) | 21% |
Exercise diary engagement | .45 | < .001 | 17% (< .001) | 20% |
Forum use (dichotomised) | .04 | .30 ns | 0.2% (.29 ns) | 3% |
Mutually adjusted associations with percentage weight loss 2 | ||||
 | Beta | p | Variance explained by engagement R2 change (p) | Variance explained by model Adjusted R2 |
Women | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Food diary engagement | .36 | < .001 | 13% (< .001) | 19% |
Exercise diary engagement | .03 | .48 ns | Â | Â |
Forum use (dichotomised) | .07 | < .01 | Â | Â |
Men | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Food diary engagement | .30 | < .001 | 19% (< .001) | 22% |
Exercise diary engagement | .21 | < .01 | Â | Â |
Forum use (dichotomised) | -.01 | .75 ns | Â | Â |