Table 2 Intervention features
From: Meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels
Source | Tailored | Theory | Interactive Features | Attrition (%) | Logins | Psyc Imp | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | Int | ||||||
Bosak and Yates, 2009 [15] | Limited | SCT | AC, Edu, ER, Fac, FB, GS, Q, SM, UC | 14 | 17 | NR | Yes |
Carr et al., 2008 [16] | Limited | TTM | Edu, ER, Fac, FB, GS, Q, SM, | 52 | 62 | NR | NR |
Cook et al., 2007 [17] | Nil | SCT, SOC | GS | 13 | 15 | NR | Yes |
Dunton and Robertson, 2008 [18] | Full | TTM, HBM | Edu, ER, FB | 15 | 16 | NR | No |
Glasgow et al., 2010b[19] | Nil | SCT, Self-M, SEM | Edu, ER, Fac, FB, GS, Q SM, UC | 17 | 20 | 28 | Yes |
Grim et al., 2011b[20] | Nil | SCT, | Edu Q, UC | 28 | 24 | NR | Yes |
Hager et al., 2002b[21] | Limited | TTM | FB | 23 | 24 | NR | Yes |
Haung et al., 2009 b[22] | Limited | TTM | AC, Edu, ER, FB, Q, SC, SM, UC | 12 | NR | NR | Yes |
Hurling et al., 2007 [23] | Full | Other | AC, Edu, ER, FB, GS, SC,SM, UC, | NR | NR | 26.1 | Yes |
Kim and Kang, 2006 b[24] | Limited | TTM | AC, FB, GS, UC, | NR | NR | NR | No |
Kosma et al., 2005 [25] | Limited | TTM | AC, Edu, FB, ER, UC, | 50 | 54 | NR | No |
Leibreich et al., 2009 [26] | Limited | SCT | AC, Edu, ER, Fac, FB, SM, UC, | 10 | 8 | NR | Yes |
Lorig et al., 2006 [27] | Limited | Self-M | AC, Edu, ER, Fac, FB, GS, Q, UC | 19 | 22 | 26.5 | No |
Lorig et al., 2008 [28] | Full | Other | AC, Edu, ER, Fac, FB, GS, Q, SM, UC, | 24 | 29 | 31.5 | Yes |
Lorig et al., 2010 [29] | Nil | Self-M | AC, Edu, ER, Fac, FB, GS, SC, SM, UC | 15 | 20 | NR | Yes |
Mailey et al., 2011 [30] | NIL | SCT | FB, GS, SM, ER, UC, Edu | 9 | 13 | NR | Yes |
Marshall et al., 2003 [31] | Limited | SOC | ER, FB, GS, Q | 22 | 24 | NR | NR |
McConnon et al., 2007 [32] | Limited | Nil | ER, FB | 31 | 51 | 15.8 | NR |
McKay et al., 2001 [33] | Full | Self-M, SEM | AC, Fac, FB, GS, SM | 13 | 8 | 8.9 | No |
Morgan et al., 2009 [34] | Nil | SCT | AC, Fac, FB, GS, SM | 17 | 18 | 120 | NR |
Morgan et al., 2011 [35] | Nil | SCT | Edu, FB, GS, SM | 19 | 19 | NR | Yes |
Motl et al., 2011 [36] | Nil | SCT | AC, Edu, ER, Fac, FB, GS, SC, SM, UC, | 11 | 15 | 8.6 | Yes |
Napolitano et al., 2003 [37] | Limited | SCT, SOC | Edu, ER, Q | 12 | 30 | NR | Yes |
Nguyen et al., 2008 [38] | Full | SCT, Self-M, Other | Edu, ER, Fac, FB, GS, SC, SM | 24 | 31 | 59 | Yes |
Ornes and Randsell, 2007b[39] | Nil | SCT | Edu, ER, FB, GS, SM, | 7 | NR | NR | NR |
Parrott et al., 2008 [40] | Nil | TPB | AC | 0 | 0 | NA | Yes |
Plotnikoff et al., 2005 [41] | Nil | SCT, TPB, TTM, PMT | Nil | 18 | NR | NA | Yes |
Skar et al., 2011 b[42] | Nil | TPB | FB | 42 | 44 | NR | Yes |
Smith et al., 2009 [43] | Limited | TTM | Edu, ER, Fac, FB, GS, Q, SM | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Spittaels et al., 2007 b[44] | Full | TPB, SOC | AC, Edu, ER, FB, GS | 34 | 40 | NR | NR |
Steele et al., 2007 b[45] | Nil | SCT, Self-M | AC, Edu, ER, Fac, Q, SM, UC, | 15 | 10 | 11.8 | NR |
Wadsworth and Hallam, 2010 [46] | Nil | SCT | Edu, ER, Fac, FB, GS, Q, SM, UC | 22 | 24 | NR | Yes |
Winnett et al., 2007 b[47] | Nil | SCT | Edu, FB, GS, SM, UC, | 15 | 15 | NR | No |
Zutz et al., 2007 [48] | Nil | Nil | Edu, Fac, FB, Q, SC, UC | 13 | 0 | 50 | Yes |