Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of linear regression investigation the association between sBMI and the number of food outlets in the three different environments after adjustment for covariates

From: A cross sectional study investigating the association between exposure to food outlets and childhood obesity in Leeds, UK

 

Home

School

Commute

2 km retail

      

Q1

REF

P

REF

P

REF

P

Q2

0.01 [-0.05:0.07]

0.76

-0.07 [-0.13:-0.01]

0.03

-0.24 [-0.10:0.06]

0.57

Q3

0.05 [-0.02:0.12]

0.14

-0.09 [-0.16:-0.03]

0.00

0.01 [-0.07:0.09]

0.82

Q4

0.02 [-0.05:0.10]

0.57

-0.00 [-0.07:0.06]

0.90

-0.02 [-0.11:0.07]

0.62

2 km takeaways

      

Q1

REF

P

REF

P

REF

P

Q2

0.00 [-0.06:0.06]

0.98

-0.03 [-0.09:0.03]

0.37

-0.02 [-0.10:0.06]

0.59

Q3

0.03 [-0.04:0.09]

0.39

-0.06 [-0.12:-0.01]

0.03

-0.06 [-0.01:0.02]

0.14

Q4

0.00 [-0.07:0.07]

0.98

0.02 [-0.06:0.09]

0.69

-0.04 [-0.13:0.04]

0.32

2 km supermarkets

      

Q1

REF

P

REF

P

REF

P

Q2

-0.01 [-0.07:0.05]

0.70

0.03 [-0.04:0.10]

0.40

-0.10 [-0.17:-0.02]

0.01

Q3

0.00 [-0.06:0.07]

0.92

0.04 [-0.03:0.10]

0.28

-0.08 [-0.18:0.01]

0.07

Q4

0.01 [-0.07:0.08]

0.82

0.01 [-0.05:0.07]

0.75

-0.02 [-0.10:0.06]

0.61

2 km total outlets

      

Q1

REF

P

REF

P

REF

P

Q2

0.04 [-0.02:0.12]

0.17

-0.02 [-0.08:0.04]

0.48

-0.05 [-0.13:0.04]

0.29

Q3

0.04 [-0.03:0.10]

0.30

-0.08 [-0.14:-0.02]

0.01

-0.01 [-0.08:0.07]

0.90

Q4

0.04 [-0.04:0.11]

0.36

0.01 [-0.06:0.08]

0.74

-0.05 [-0.14:0.03]

0.23

  1. Values are β [95% confidence intervals]; All models control for gender, ethnicity and SES (IDACI).