Skip to main content

Table 3 The association of POSDAT item and reported ‘high/low park use’ by adolescents and odds ratios from logistic regression models assessing associations between park features (measured using POSDAT and GIS) and high/low park use after adjustment for park size and number of participants living within 800 m of park

From: Associations between park features and adolescent park use for physical activity

POSDAT item

% of low use parks (n = 43) with POSDAT item present or mean (SD)

% of high use parks (n = 15) with POSDAT item present or mean (SD)

P-value (one-sided) fishers exact or t- test

OR

p -value

Activities

     

Activity space: Soccer

7.0

0.0

0.422

  

Activity space: Football

9.3

7.1

0.643

  

Activity space: Cricket

11.6

0

0.230

  

Activity space: Baseball

4.7

0

0.566

  

Activity space: Fitness circuit

0

7.1

0.246

  

Activity space: Basketball/netball hoops

9.3

21.4

0.224

  

Activity space: Hockey

2.3

0

0.754

  

Activity space: Athletics

2.3

0

0.754

  

Activity space: Rugby

2.3

0

0.754

  

Activity space: Skateboarding/BMX

4.7

28.6

0.027

6.41

0.011

Children’s playground

67.4

85.7

0.164

4.35

0.125

Environmental quality

     

Park on river or foreshore

14.0

21.4

0.386

  

Water feature: Fountain

4.7

0

0.566

  

Water feature: Any

4.7

0

0.509

  

Other features: Waterbirds

16.3

14.3

0.614

  

Other features: Gardens

20.9

21.4

0.627

  

No features

65.1

64.3

0.598

  

Number of trees > 25

95.3

85.7

0.004

6.72

0.010

Walking paths present

37.2

71.4

0.027

4.64

0.021

Path shade (High)

4.7

7.1

0.600

  

Playground shaded

23.3

42.9

0.224

  

Grass reticulated

81.4

92.9

0.288

  

High NDVI

25.5

53.3

0.051

3.32

0.054

Dogs

     

Dogs allowed

95.3

100

0.566

  

Amenities

     

Barbeques

14.0

57.1

0.003

9.24

0.003

Seating

34.9

50.0

0.243

  

Picnic tables

37.2

71.4

0.025

5.64

0.018

Public access toilets

18.6

64.3

0.002

13.93

0.002

Public art present

7.0

7.1

0.688

  

Lighting: Around courts, buildings, equipment

16.3

50.0

0.017

6.09

0.012

Safety

     

Park surrounded by minor roads only

72.1

78.6

0.461

  

Perimeter orientation ratio*

30.94 (25.00)

32.49 (21.26)

0.831

  

Number of lots around park*

10.63 (7.00)

12.00 (8.36)

0.537

  

Number of lots facing park*

7.05 (5.94)

8.40 (5.34)

0.440

  

Number of lots orientation ratio*

0.56 (0.39)

0.59 (0.32)

0.791

  

Additional items

     

Park size m2*

14786.76 (26944.14)

21199.41 (20378.49)

0.585

  

Distance to beach (m)*

1426.65 (2798.61)

1370.81 (1282.16)

0.872

  

Tree canopy area*

1647.12 (3461.58)

3083.54 (4462.38)

0.215

  

Tree canopy coverage (% total park)*

10.80 (7.75)

14.12 (13.98)

0.266

  

NDVI *

0.23 (0.09)

0.29 (0.08)

0.039

  

Attractiveness score (Adult) *

32.8 (14.56)

45.7 (13.2)

0.005

  

Activity space count*

0.48 (1.05)

0.46 (74)

0.153

0.855

0.002

  1. *Continuous independent variable.
  2. Bold OR and p values = the seven park features included in the adolescent attractiveness score for park use.