Table 1 Critical appraisal criteria of study methodologies
Study | Criteria 1 | Criteria 2 | Criteria 3 | Criteria 4 | Criteria 5 | Criteria 6 | Criteria 7 | Criteria 8 | Criteria 9 | Criteria 10 | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Abu-Moghli et al. 2010 [1] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
2. Afifi Soweid et al. 2003 [69] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | − |
3. Alpar et al. 2008 [67] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ∅ |
4. Bowden et al. 2007 [37] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
5. Boyle et al. 2011 [38] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
6. Brown et al. 2011 [39] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
7. Buscemi et al. 2011 [40] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
8. Cardinal et al. 2002 [41] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
9. Cavallo et al. 2012 [19] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
10. Chen et al. 1989 [42] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | − |
11. Claxton et al. 2009 [43] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ∅ |
12. Evans & Mary 2002 [43] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | − |
13. Fischer & Bryant 2008 [45] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
14. Gieck & Olsen 2007 [46] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
15. Gow et al. 2010 [47] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + |
16. Gray et al. 1987 [47] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | − |
17. Grim et al. 2011 [5] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
18. Ha & Caine-Bish 2009 [49] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
19. Hager et al. 2012 [50] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
20. Harvey-Berino et al. 2012 [52] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | − |
21. Hekler et al. 2010 [51] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
22. Huang et al. 2009 [7] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + |
23. Ince 2008 [68] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ∅ |
24. Kolodinsky et al. 2008 [53] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | − |
25. Lachausse 2012 [54] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
26. LeCheminant et al. 2011 [55] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
27. Magoc et al. 2011 [57] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + |
28. Martens et al. 2012 [40] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
29. McClary King et al. 2013 [56] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
30. Musgrave & Thornbury 1976 [59] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | − |
31. Pearce & Cross 2013 [31] | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
32. Pearman et al. 1997 [60] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | − |
33. Peterson et al. 2010 [61] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
34. Reed et al. 2011 [62] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
35. Sallis et al. 1999 [63] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
36. Skar et al. 2011 [70] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ∅ |
37. Tully & Cupples 2011 [71] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
38. Wadsworth et al. [64] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ∅ |
39. Werch et al. 2007 [65] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | + |
40. Werch et al. 2008 [73] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
41. Yakusheva et al. 2011 [66] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ∅ |
37 | 25 | 10 | 7 | 4 | 34 | 23 | 35 | 33 | 41 |