Predictor | Odds of being overweight/obesea | Body mass indexb | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | OR | 95 % CI | p | exp(b) | exp(95 % CI) | p |
Socio-demographic | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 Gender (reference: male) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
  Female | 0.60 | 0.56, 0.65 | <.001 | 0.97 | 0.96, 0.98 | <.001 |
 Area socio-economic status (reference: low) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
  High socio-economic status | 0.89 | 0.80, 0.98 | .021 | 0.98 | 0.97, 0.99 | <.001 |
 Education (reference: less than high school ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
  High school graduate | 0.99 | 0.89, 1.11 | .903 | 0.99 | 0.98, 1.00 | .167 |
  College or more | 0.69 | 0.61, 0.78 | <.001 | 0.96 | 0.95, 0.97 | <.001 |
 Working status (reference: not working) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
  Working | 0.98 | 0.90, 1.07 | .665 | 0.99 | 0.99, 1.00 | .069 |
 Marital status (reference: single) |  |  |  |  |  |  |
  Couple | 1.19 | 1.10, 1.29 | <.001 | 1.00 | 0.99, 1.01 | .291 |
 Age (yrs) | 1.60 | 1.14, 2.26 | <.001 | 1.05 | 1.01, 1.09 | .006 |
Perceived environmental attributes | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Residential density | 1.000 | 0.999, 1.000 | .079 | 1.001 | 0.999, 1.003 | .138 |
Land use mix – access | 1.07 | 0.99, 1.15 | .078 | 1.01 | 0.99, 1.01 | .064 |
Land use mix – diversity (9 destination types) | 0.94 | 0.88, 1.00 | .062 | 0.99 | 0.99, 1.00 | .043 |
Connectivity | 1.00 | 0.94, 1.05 | .902 | 1.00 | 0.99, 1.00 | .137 |
Infrastructure and safety | 0.98 | 0.91, 1.06 | .595 | 1.00 | 0.99, 1.01 | .819 |
Aesthetics | 0.96 | 0.90, 1.03 | .287 | 0.99 | 0.99, 1.00 | .055 |
Safety from traffic | 0.92 | 0.86, 0.97 | .005 | 0.99 | 0.99, 1.00 | .002 |
Safety from crime | 0.99 | 0.92, 1.04 | .496 | 0.99 | 0.99, 1.00 | .071 |
 Curvilinear component | - | - | - | F(1.52) = 4.72 |  | .017 |
Few cul-de-sacs | 0.98 | 0.94, 1.02 | .364 | 1.00 | 1.00, 1.00 | .792 |
No major barriers | 0.97 | 0.92, 1.02 | .177 | 1.00 | 0.99, 1.00 | .480 |
Composite walkability score | 0.98 | 0.97, 0.99 | .002 | 0.992 | 0.88, 0.995 | <.001 |