Skip to main content

Table 5 Logistic regression model showing the association between socio-demographic and cooking practice characteristics, and dish choice motives (N = 49,537, NutriNet-Santé study, 2013)a

From: Motives for dish choices during home meal preparation: results from a large sample of the NutriNet-Santé study

 

Healthy diet

Constraints

Pleasure

Specific diets

Organization

OR

95 % CI

p b

OR

95 % CI

p b

OR

95 % CI

p b

OR

95 % CI

p b

OR

95 % CI

p b

Sex

                    

 Men

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

 Women

2.40

2.29

2.52

 

2.76

2.61

2.91

 

1.65

1.54

1.77

 

2.20

2.03

2.39

 

1.87

1.73

2.03

 

Age

                    

 18–30

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

 30–50

1.53

1.43

1.63

 

0.80

0.75

0.86

 

1.06

0.97

1.16

 

0.95

0.87

1.03

 

1.20

1.09

1.32

 

 50–65

2.10

1.96

2.24

 

0.46

0.43

0.49

 

1.25

1.15

1.37

 

0.70

0.65

0.76

 

1.00

0.91

1.10

 

 ≥ 65

2.05

1.90

2.22

 

0.30

0.28

0.32

 

1.30

1.18

1.43

 

0.58

0.52

0.64

 

0.98

0.88

1.09

 

Education

                    

 Up to Secondary

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

 Some college

1.20

1.15

1.26

 

1.07

1.02

1.12

 

0.82

0.77

0.87

 

0.86

0.81

0.92

 

0.91

0.86

0.97

 

 University

1.26

1.20

1.32

 

1.23

1.17

1.29

 

0.66

0.62

0.70

 

0.67

0.62

0.71

 

0.80

0.74

0.85

 

Monthly income per household unit (€/CU)c

                    

 < 1,200

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

0.004

1

  

< .0001

1

  

0.023

 1,200–1,800

0.96

0.94

1.07

 

0.96

0.90

1.02

 

0.96

0.88

1.03

 

0.78

0.72

0.85

 

1.05

0.96

1.14

 

 1,800–2,700

1.11

1.04

1.18

 

0.91

0.86

0.97

 

0.96

0.88

1.04

 

0.74

0.68

0.80

 

1.13

1.04

1.24

 

 ≥ 2,700

1.13

1.05

1.20

 

0.84

0.79

0.90

 

1.01

0.93

1.09

 

0.62

0.57

0.68

 

1.04

0.95

1.14

 

 Missing data

1.08

1.00

1.16

 

0.93

0.86

1.00

 

1.11

1.02

1.22

 

0.91

0.83

1.00

 

1.11

1.01

1.23

 

Presence of children in the household

                    

 No

1

  

0.48

1

  

0.011

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

0.36

 Yes

0.98

0.94

1.03

 

1.07

1.02

1.12

 

0.77

0.72

0.83

 

0.69

0.65

0.74

 

0.97

0.90

1.04

 

Cooking skills

                    

 Low

1

  

< .0001

1

  

0.024

1

  

< .0001

1

  

0.0012

1

  

< .0001

 Medium

1.16

1.09

1.24

 

1.08

1.00

1.15

 

1.18

1.06

1.32

 

0.86

0.78

0.94

 

1.20

1.07

1.33

 

 High

1.66

1.54

1.78

 

1.02

0.95

1.10

 

1.87

1.66

2.09

 

0.92

0.83

1.02

 

1.38

1.24

1.55

 

Time spent in meal preparation (weekdays)

                    

 0–15 min

1

  

< .0001

1

  

0.011

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

 15–30 min

1.28

1.20

1.37

 

1.02

0.96

1.09

 

1.09

0.99

1.21

 

1.04

0.94

1.14

 

1.06

0.96

1.18

 

 30–45

1.55

1.45

1.66

 

0.94

0.88

1.01

 

1.33

1.20

1.47

 

1.23

1.11

1.36

 

1.17

1.06

1.31

 

 ≥ 45 min

1.73

1.60

1.87

 

0.97

0.90

1.05

 

1.54

1.38

1.72

 

1.28

1.15

1.43

 

1.43

1.28

1.60

 

Cooking enjoyment (weekdays)

                    

 No

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

< .0001

1

  

0.51

 Yes

1.63

1.56

1.71

 

0.77

0.73

0.81

 

1.81

1.69

1.94

 

1.26

1.17

1.34

 

1.02

0.96

1.09

 
  1. aModel was adjusted for sex, age, education level, income, presence of children, cooking skills, time spent in meal preparation (weekdays) and cooking enjoyment (weekdays)
  2. bThe modeled probability was a motive ranked as important (i.e. average score ≥ 4)
  3. cCU: Household Consumer Units. One CU is attributed for the first adult in the household, 0.5 for other persons aged 14 or older and 0.3 for children under 14