| |
%
|
Odds Ratio (95 % CI)
|
Adjusted Odds Ratio 95 % CIa
|
P value
|
|---|
|
Proportion had used cycleway (n = 75)
|
14.7
| | | |
|
Age
|
|
18–24
|
15.5
|
1.0
|
1.0
| |
|
25–34
|
20.9
|
1.44 (0.62–3.36)
|
0.54 (0.18–1.57)
|
0.890
|
|
35–44
|
18.4
|
1.23 (0.53–2.85)
|
0.73 (0.25–2.15)
|
0.953
|
|
45–55
|
9.6
|
0.58 (0.25–1.34)
|
0.42 (0.14–1.24)
|
0.192
|
|
Sex
|
|
Female
|
13.9
|
1.0
|
1.0
| |
|
Male
|
16.3
|
1.21 (0.74–1.99)
|
0.64 (0.34–1.21)
|
0.306
|
|
Education
|
|
Less than tertiary
|
13.0
|
1.0
|
1.0
| |
|
Tertiary or higher
|
15.5
|
1.23 (0.69–2.20)
|
0.83 (0.39–1.77)
|
0.908
|
|
Income
|
|
Less than $80 K (AUS)
|
13.2
|
1.0
|
1.0
| |
|
$80 K or more
|
17.0
|
1.34 (0.75–2.39)
|
1.26 (0.63–2.54)
|
0.551
|
|
Weekly cycling frequency
|
|
Less than weekly
| |
1.0
|
1.0
| |
|
At least weekly
| |
7.44 (4.41–12.56)
|
7.50 (3.93–14.31)
|
<0.001
|
|
Cyclist type
|
|
Low intensity recreational
|
7.0
|
1.0
|
1.0
| |
|
High intensity recreational
|
30.3
|
5.79 (2.45–13.68)
|
4.38 (1.53–12.59)
|
0.026
|
|
Low intensity transport
|
25.4
|
4.54 (2.50–8.22)
|
2.42 (1.17–5.04)
|
0.032
|
|
High intensity transport
|
31.0
|
5.97 (2.72–13.09)
|
2.40 (0.90–6.44)
|
0.598
|
|
Distance from bicycle path in 500 mb
| |
1.21 (1.12–1.31)
|
1.24 (1.13–1.37)
|
<0.001
|
|
Distance from bicycle path in 100 mb
| |
1.04 (1.02–1.05)
|
1.04 (1.02–1.06)
|
<0.001
|
-
aAdjusted for all other variables in the model
-
bOne or the other included in the model at one time
- Bold text highlights statistically signficant associations
